Mercado Annalyn C, Carroll Linda J, Cassidy J David, Côté Pierre
FIT for Active Living Program, 8th Floor, Saskatoon City Hospital, 701 Queen Street, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7K 0M7.
Pain. 2005 Sep;117(1-2):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.014.
Despite evidence suggesting that coping is an important concept in the study of pain, its role in predicting the development of disabling pain has not been previously studied. To assess the relationship between coping and the development of disabling pain.
From a random sample of adults, we formed a cohort of individuals with non-disabling neck and/or low back pain (n=571). Participants were followed 6 and 12 months after the index survey. Coping was measured with the Vanderbilt Pain Management Inventory. The Chronic Pain Questionnaire was used to measure the presence of disabling neck and/or low back pain. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to investigate the role of passive coping in the development of disabling pain while controlling for confounders.
Passive coping was a strong, independent risk factor for disabling neck and/or back pain. Those using moderate to high levels of passive coping strategies were at an over five-fold increased risk of developing disabling pain (Moderate: HRR=5.19, 95% CI=1.78-15.1; High: HRR=6.80, 95% CI=2.36-19.6). Active coping was not found to be a significant risk factor for disabling neck and/or back pain.
Passive coping is a strong and independent predictor of disabling neck and/or back pain. This strong relationship identifies passive coping as a marker for risk of disability and can allow for the identification of individuals at risk and in need of intervention to aid in improving their overall adjustment.
尽管有证据表明应对方式是疼痛研究中的一个重要概念,但其在预测致残性疼痛发展方面的作用此前尚未得到研究。为了评估应对方式与致残性疼痛发展之间的关系。
从成年人随机样本中,我们组建了一个患有非致残性颈部和/或下背部疼痛的队列(n = 571)。在初次调查后的6个月和12个月对参与者进行随访。使用范德比尔特疼痛管理量表测量应对方式。使用慢性疼痛问卷测量是否存在致残性颈部和/或下背部疼痛。我们使用Cox比例风险回归分析来研究被动应对方式在致残性疼痛发展中的作用,同时控制混杂因素。
被动应对方式是导致致残性颈部和/或背部疼痛的一个强大的独立风险因素。那些使用中度至高度被动应对策略的人患致残性疼痛的风险增加了五倍多(中度:风险比回归=5.19,95%置信区间=1.78 - 15.1;高度:风险比回归=6.80,95%置信区间=2.36 - 19.6)。未发现主动应对方式是导致致残性颈部和/或背部疼痛的显著风险因素。
被动应对方式是致残性颈部和/或背部疼痛的一个强大且独立的预测因素。这种紧密关系将被动应对方式确定为残疾风险的一个标志,并有助于识别有风险且需要干预以改善其整体适应能力的个体。