• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生的收入过高吗?

Do physicians make too much money?

作者信息

Curzer H J

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409.

出版信息

Theor Med. 1992 Mar;13(1):45-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00489219.

DOI:10.1007/BF00489219
PMID:1604432
Abstract

The average net income of physicians in the USA is more than four times the average net income of people working in all domestic industries in the USA. When critics suggest that physicians make too much money, defenders typically appeal to the following four prominent principles of economic justice: Aristotle's Income Principle, the Free Market Principle, the Utilitarian Income Principle, and Rawls' Difference Principle. I shall show that no matter which of these four principles is assumed, the present high incomes of physicians cannot be defended.

摘要

美国医生的平均净收入是美国所有国内行业从业者平均净收入的四倍多。当批评者指出医生收入过高时,辩护者通常会诉诸以下四项经济正义的突出原则:亚里士多德的收入原则、自由市场原则、功利主义收入原则和罗尔斯的差别原则。我将表明,无论假定这四项原则中的哪一项,医生目前的高收入都无法得到辩护。

相似文献

1
Do physicians make too much money?医生的收入过高吗?
Theor Med. 1992 Mar;13(1):45-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00489219.
2
Justice and medical ethics.正义与医学伦理。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jul 20;291(6489):201-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6489.201.
3
Rawlsian justice and a human right to health care.罗尔斯式正义与医疗保健人权。
J Med Philos. 1983 Nov;8(4):329-38. doi: 10.1093/jmp/8.4.329.
4
Rawls' theory of justice: a naturalistic evaluation(1).罗尔斯的正义理论:一种自然主义的评价(1)
J Med Philos. 2005 Oct;30(5):449-65. doi: 10.1080/03605310500253022.
5
Justice and allocation of medical resources.医疗资源的公平性与分配
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jul 27;291(6490):266-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6490.266.
6
Applying Rawls to medical cases: an investigation into the usages of analytical philosophy.将罗尔斯理论应用于医疗案例:对分析哲学应用的调查
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Winter;10(4):749-64. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-4-749.
7
The relevance of Rawls' principle of justice for research on cognitively impaired patients.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(1):45-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1019552003103.
8
Abortion, property rights, and the welfare state.堕胎、财产权与福利国家。
Public Aff Q. 1998 Oct;12(4):369-81.
9
The genetic difference principle.
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Spring;4(2):W21-8. doi: 10.1162/152651604323097952.
10
Bioterrorism and patent rights: "compulsory licensure" and the case of Cipro.生物恐怖主义与专利权:“强制许可”及环丙沙星案例
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Summer;2(3):29-39. doi: 10.1162/152651602760250084.

引用本文的文献

1
What's so special about medicine?医学有什么特别之处?
Theor Med. 1993 Mar;14(1):27-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00993986.

本文引用的文献

1
Bed supply and hospital utilization: a natural experiment.床位供应与医院利用:一项自然实验。
Hospitals. 1961 Nov 1;35:36-42.
2
Hospital costs relate to the supply of beds.医院成本与床位供应有关。
Mod Hosp. 1959 Apr;92(4):71-3 passim.
3
Cost-shifting under cost reimbursement and prospective payment.
J Health Econ. 1985 Sep;4(3):261-71. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(85)90032-3.
4
Which non-surgeons are doing best in earnings?哪些非外科医生的收入最高?
Med Econ. 1989 Dec 4;66(24):94-8, 100, 103-10.
5
The advancement of medical research: a twenty-year view of the role of the National Institutes of Health.医学研究的进展:对国立卫生研究院作用的二十年审视。
J Med Educ. 1967 Feb;42(2):97-108.
6
Medicine as a career: choices and consequences.
Theor Med. 1989 Sep;10(3):217-29. doi: 10.1007/BF00489440.