• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗精神病药物满意度量表的编制及内部一致性

The development and internal consistency of the satisfaction with Antipsychotic Medication Scale.

作者信息

Rofail Diana, Gray Richard, Gournay Kevin

机构信息

Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2005 Jul;35(7):1063-72. doi: 10.1017/s0033291705004526.

DOI:10.1017/s0033291705004526
PMID:16045072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Satisfaction with antipsychotic medication is an important outcome variable. To date, there is a lack of a well-established measure to quantify patient satisfaction with psychiatric medication. This paper describes the development, dimensionality, reliability and validity of the Satisfaction with Antipsychotic Medication (SWAM) scale.

METHOD

Clinical and academic experts devised a 33-item Likert scale satisfaction questionnaire. Following a pilot study in a sample of 69 people with schizophrenia, 315 people with schizophrenia on the caseload of local mental health services in three London boroughs completed the questionnaire. The dimensionality, internal consistency and validity of the devised instrument were assessed.

RESULTS

Reliability of the SWAM scale was good for subscales and total scores. The alpha coefficient for the two subscales: treatment acceptability and medication insight were 0.92 and 0.84 respectively. The a coefficient for the SWAM scale total score was 0.91 and ranged from 0.92 to 0.90.

CONCLUSION

Testing of the psychometric properties of the SWAM scale demonstrate that it is a reliable instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with antipsychotic medication. The measure could be used in routine clinical practice in mental health services to assess patient satisfaction with psychiatric medication.

摘要

背景

对抗精神病药物的满意度是一个重要的结果变量。迄今为止,缺乏一种成熟的方法来量化患者对抗精神病药物的满意度。本文描述了抗精神病药物满意度(SWAM)量表的开发、维度、信度和效度。

方法

临床和学术专家设计了一份包含33个条目的李克特量表满意度问卷。在对69名精神分裂症患者进行预试验后,伦敦三个行政区当地心理健康服务机构登记在册的315名精神分裂症患者完成了该问卷。对所设计工具的维度、内部一致性和效度进行了评估。

结果

SWAM量表各分量表和总分的信度良好。两个分量表(治疗可接受性和药物认知)的α系数分别为0.92和0.84。SWAM量表总分的α系数为0.91,范围在0.92至0.90之间。

结论

对SWAM量表心理测量特性的测试表明,它是一种测量患者对抗精神病药物满意度的可靠工具。该测量方法可用于心理健康服务的常规临床实践,以评估患者对抗精神病药物的满意度。

相似文献

1
The development and internal consistency of the satisfaction with Antipsychotic Medication Scale.抗精神病药物满意度量表的编制及内部一致性
Psychol Med. 2005 Jul;35(7):1063-72. doi: 10.1017/s0033291705004526.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) to assess satisfaction with antipsychotic medication among schizophrenia patients.精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物满意度的测评:药物满意度问卷(MSQ)的心理计量学评估。
Schizophr Res. 2010 May;118(1-3):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
3
A large-scale validation study of the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS).药物依从性评定量表(MARS)的大规模验证研究。
Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.10.029. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
4
Results of a pilot cluster randomised trial of the use of a Medication Review Tool for people taking antipsychotic medication.一项针对服用抗精神病药物人群使用药物审查工具的试点整群随机试验结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 4;16:205. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0921-7.
5
Reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication among Portuguese-speaking Brazilian patients with hypertension.巴西葡萄牙语高血压患者用药治疗满意度问卷的信效度研究
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1931-40. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13282. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
The Patient Assessment Questionnaire: initial validation of a measure of treatment effectiveness for patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.患者评估问卷:用于评估精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍患者治疗效果的测量工具的初步验证。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):857-66. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
7
Evaluation of the subjects' response to antipsychotics questionnaire.评估受试者对抗精神病药物问卷的反应。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Jan;21(1):63-9. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000185023.55903.ba.
8
Effects and side effects of antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia: pros and cons of available self-rating scales.抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的疗效与副作用:现有自评量表的利弊
Schizophr Res. 2009 Jul;112(1-3):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.026. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
9
Patient satisfaction with psychotropic drugs: Validation of the PAtient SAtisfaction with Psychotropic (PASAP) scale in patients with bipolar disorder.患者对精神类药物的满意度:双相情感障碍患者中精神类药物患者满意度(PASAP)量表的验证。
Eur Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;29(3):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10
The Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) validated against electronic monitoring in assessing the antipsychotic medication adherence of outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.在评估精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍门诊患者抗精神病药物依从性方面,经电子监测验证的简易依从性评定量表(BARS)。
Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.12.470. Epub 2008 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures for medication treatment satisfaction: a systematic review of measure development and measurement properties.患者报告的药物治疗满意度测量指标:测量开发和测量特性的系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 2;22(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03560-3.
2
Important aspects of experiences from patients and parents related to medications in Child and Adolescents Mental Health Services (CAMHS) - a qualitative study.儿童和青少年心理健康服务 (CAMHS) 中与药物相关的患者和家长体验的重要方面——一项定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 28;12(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01962-9.
3
Measuring the Patient Experience of Mental Health Care: A Systematic and Critical Review of Patient-Reported Experience Measures.
衡量精神卫生保健的患者体验:对患者报告体验指标的系统与批判性综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Nov 3;14:2147-2161. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S255264. eCollection 2020.
4
Attitudes toward antipsychotic treatment among patients with bipolar disorders and their clinicians: a systematic review.双相情感障碍患者及其临床医生对抗精神病药物治疗的态度:一项系统综述。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Aug 30;13:2285-2296. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S139557. eCollection 2017.
5
Treatment satisfaction with paliperidone extended-release tablets: open-label study in schizophrenia patients dissatisfied with previous antipsychotic medication.对帕利哌酮缓释片的治疗满意度:针对对先前抗精神病药物治疗不满意的精神分裂症患者的开放标签研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Apr 13;13:1089-1097. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S130483. eCollection 2017.
6
Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review.从患者角度衡量与药物相关的体验:一项系统综述。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Oct 4;7:157-171. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S102198. eCollection 2016.
7
Cross-sectional comparison of first-generation antipsychotic long-acting injections vs risperidone long-acting injection: patient-rated attitudes, satisfaction and tolerability.第一代抗精神病长效注射剂与利培酮长效注射剂的横断面比较:患者自评态度、满意度和耐受性。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2016 Jun;6(3):162-71. doi: 10.1177/2045125316632458. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
Satisfaction of immediate or delayed switch to paliperidone palmitate in patients unsatisfied with current oral atypical antipsychotics.对当前口服非典型抗精神病药物不满意的患者立即或延迟换用棕榈酸帕利哌酮的满意度
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Nov;30(6):320-8. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000093.
9
Assessing the Impact of Caring for a Person with Schizophrenia: Development of the Schizophrenia Caregiver Questionnaire.评估照料精神分裂症患者的影响:精神分裂症照料者问卷的编制
Patient. 2015 Dec;8(6):507-20. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0114-3.
10
The impact of newer atypical antipsychotics on patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia.新型非典型抗精神病药物对精神分裂症患者报告结局的影响。
CNS Drugs. 2013 Aug;27(8):625-36. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0070-1.