• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美学托槽材料粗糙度、硬度和耐磨性的比较评估

Comparative assessment of the roughness, hardness, and wear resistance of aesthetic bracket materials.

作者信息

Zinelis Spiros, Eliades Theodore, Eliades George, Makou Margarita, Silikas Nikolaos

机构信息

Department of Biomaterials, Section of Basic Sciences and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):890-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.007
PMID:16045979
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess critical properties of orthodontic aesthetic bracket materials.

METHOD

Samples of polycarbonate, poly(oxy)methylene, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), and polycrystalline alumina raw material used from bracket manufacturing were subjected to: (a) profilometry for the determination of Ra, Rq, Rmax and Rz roughness parameters; (b) Vickers hardness (HV50) testing; and (c) wear resistance determined by the scratch test. The results were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons test at alpha=0.05 level of significance.

RESULTS

The UHMWP and alumina specimens showed the highest roughness values for all parameters. The highest hardness, amongst the polymeric raw materials, was obtained from the poly(oxy)methylene appliances. Differences were also noted between the polycarbonate raw material of different manufacturers implying an effect from the manufacturing process. With the exception of alumina, the highest wear resistance was found for the poly(oxy)methylene specimens.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this study reveal the variability among aesthetic plastic bracket raw materials, their reduced hardness and wear resistance relative to alumina as well as the inappropriateness of UHMWPE as alternative bracket material.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估正畸美学托槽材料的关键性能。

方法

对托槽制造中使用的聚碳酸酯、聚甲醛、超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)和多晶氧化铝原材料样本进行以下测试:(a)轮廓仪测量以确定Ra、Rq、Rmax和Rz粗糙度参数;(b)维氏硬度(HV50)测试;(c)通过划痕试验测定耐磨性。结果采用单因素方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行分析,显著性水平α = 0.05。

结果

UHMWP和氧化铝样本在所有参数上显示出最高的粗糙度值。在聚合物原材料中,聚甲醛器具的硬度最高。不同制造商的聚碳酸酯原材料之间也存在差异,这意味着制造工艺有影响。除氧化铝外,聚甲醛样本的耐磨性最高。

意义

本研究结果揭示了美学塑料托槽原材料之间的变异性、它们相对于氧化铝的硬度和耐磨性降低,以及UHMWPE作为替代托槽材料的不合适性。

相似文献

1
Comparative assessment of the roughness, hardness, and wear resistance of aesthetic bracket materials.美学托槽材料粗糙度、硬度和耐磨性的比较评估
Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):890-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.007.
2
Evaluation of alternative polymer bracket materials.替代高分子材料托槽的评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Mar;137(3):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.020.
3
Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.两种树脂复合材料在低辐照度发光二极管(LED)和石英卤钨灯(QTH)光固化设备等效辐射曝光下固化后的硬度和耐磨性。
Am J Dent. 2006 Feb;19(1):31-6.
4
Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to esthetic bracket materials.变形链球菌对美观托槽材料的细菌黏附
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4 Suppl):S99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.024.
5
Electron-beam irradiation of polymer bracket materials.聚合物托槽材料的电子束辐照。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):e7-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.038.
6
Metallographic structure and hardness of titanium orthodontic brackets.正畸钛托槽的金相组织与硬度
J Orofac Orthop. 2003 Nov;64(6):426-33. doi: 10.1007/s00056-003-0308-5.
7
Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites.两种微混合牙科复合材料在水中老化6个月对硬度和表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Jun;17(4):323-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00295.x. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
8
Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials.正畸矫治器上的微生物附着:I. 托槽材料的润湿性及早期薄膜形成
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Oct;108(4):351-60. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70032-3.
9
Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.体外条件下牙科材料的表面粗糙度和光泽度与压力及抛光时间的关系
Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):146-65. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.013. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
10
The effect of aging by thermal cycling and mechanical brushing on resilient denture liner hardness and roughness.热循环和机械刷牙老化对弹性义齿衬垫硬度和粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Jun;17(4):318-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00293.x. Epub 2008 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide With Different Concentration on the Color and Surface Microhardness of the Resin Bracket.不同浓度过氧化氢对树脂托槽颜色及表面显微硬度的影响
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Oct;11(5):e70210. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70210.
2
Development of Structurally Graded Alumina-Polymer Composites as Potential Orthodontic Bracket Materials.结构梯度氧化铝-聚合物复合材料作为潜在正畸托槽材料的开发。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Apr 5;10(4):227. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10040227.
3
The effect of beverage temperature on the surface roughness, microhardness, and color stability of the monoshade composite resin: An study.
饮料温度对单色调复合树脂表面粗糙度、显微硬度和颜色稳定性的影响:一项研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 May;36(5):740-744. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
4
New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties.新型美学内置 3D 打印托槽:概念验证和基本机械性能。
Prog Orthod. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00400-z.
5
Direct 3D Printing of Clear Orthodontic Aligners: Current State and Future Possibilities.透明正畸矫治器的直接3D打印:现状与未来可能性
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 5;14(7):1799. doi: 10.3390/ma14071799.
6
Surface analysis of metal clips of ceramic self-ligating brackets.陶瓷自锁托槽金属夹的表面分析
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Jan;49(1):12-20. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.1.12. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
7
Comparative evaluation of surface roughness of posterior primary zirconia crowns.后牙全锆冠表面粗糙度的对比评估
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Feb;20(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0382-4. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
8
Study of force loss due to friction comparing two ceramic brackets during sliding tooth movement.在牙齿滑动移动过程中比较两种陶瓷托槽因摩擦导致的力损失的研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Sep;77(5):334-40. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0038-0. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Evaluation of surface roughness of the bracket slot floor--a 3D perspective study.托槽槽沟底面表面粗糙度的评估——一项三维视角研究。
Prog Orthod. 2016;17:3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0116-2. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.材料变化对正畸固定矫治器生物力学行为的影响:有限元分析
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Jun;38(3):300-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv050. Epub 2015 Jul 14.