化学发光作为口腔癌和潜在恶性上皮病变检测中的一种诊断辅助手段。
Chemiluminescence as a diagnostic aid in the detection of oral cancer and potentially malignant epithelial lesions.
作者信息
Ram S, Siar C H
机构信息
Department of Oral Pathology, Oral Medicine & Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
出版信息
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jul;34(5):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.10.008. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
Chemiluminescence was evaluated as a diagnostic aid in the detection of oral cancer and potentially malignant epithelial lesions (PMELs) by comparing it against 1% tolonium chloride mouth rinse. Forty-six clinically identified lesions [14 primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 26 PMELs and 6 benign lesions] and five cases of normal oral mucosa from 40 subjects (inclusive of 10 previously treated SCC cases) were examined with a commercial chemiluminescent kit (Vizilite) and tolonium chloride. Biopsy and histological verification of 31 lesions disclosed 14 SCC (45.2%), 10 epithelial dysplasias (32.3%), 5 lichen planus (16.1%) and 2 benign lesions (6.4%). For the remaining 15 lesions, a biopsy was not performed owing to patient's lack of consent or ill-health. The five cases of normal oral mucosa which tested negative for both tools were also not biopsied for ethical reasons. Sensitivity for Vizilite and tolonium chloride was 100% and 70.3%, respectively; and specificity was 14.2% for Vizilite and 25% for tolonium chloride. Their accuracy was 80.6% and 64.5%, respectively. Current findings suggest that chemiluminescence is a more reliable diagnostic tool than tolonium chloride in the detection of oral cancer and PMELs, and for follow-up of patients treated for the same.
通过将化学发光与1%的甲苯胺蓝漱口液进行比较,评估其在口腔癌和潜在恶性上皮病变(PMELs)检测中作为诊断辅助手段的作用。使用商用化学发光试剂盒(Vizilite)和甲苯胺蓝对40名受试者的46个临床确诊病变[14例原发性鳞状细胞癌(SCC)、26例PMELs和6例良性病变]以及5例正常口腔黏膜病例(包括10例先前接受过治疗的SCC病例)进行了检查。对31个病变进行活检和组织学验证,结果显示14例SCC(45.2%)、10例上皮发育异常(32.3%)、5例扁平苔藓(16.1%)和2例良性病变(6.4%)。对于其余15个病变,由于患者不同意或健康状况不佳未进行活检。出于伦理原因,两种检测工具均呈阴性的5例正常口腔黏膜病例也未进行活检。Vizilite和甲苯胺蓝的敏感性分别为100%和70.3%;Vizilite的特异性为14.2%,甲苯胺蓝的特异性为25%。它们的准确率分别为80.6%和64.5%。目前的研究结果表明,在口腔癌和PMELs的检测以及对接受相同治疗的患者进行随访方面,化学发光是比甲苯胺蓝更可靠的诊断工具。