Suppr超能文献

急性胸痛、非ST段偏移且肌钙蛋白浓度正常患者的新风险评分:与TIMI风险评分的比较

New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score.

作者信息

Sanchis Juan, Bodí Vicent, Núñez Julio, Bertomeu-González Vicente, Gómez Cristina, Bosch María José, Consuegra Luciano, Bosch Xavier, Chorro Francisco J, Llàcer Angel

机构信息

Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Clínic Universitari, Universitat de València, València, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.037.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this research was to develop a risk score for patients with chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation electrocardiogram (ECG), and normal troponin levels.

BACKGROUND

Prognosis assessment in this population remains a challenge.

METHODS

A total of 646 consecutive patients were evaluated by clinical history (risk factors and chest pain score according to pain characteristics), ECG, and early exercise testing. ST-segment deviation and troponin elevation were exclusion criteria. The primary end point was mortality or myocardial infarction at one year. The secondary end point was mortality, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 14 days (similar to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] risk score).

RESULTS

Primary and secondary end point rates were 6.7% and 5.4%. A risk score was constructed using the variables related to the primary end point: chest pain score > or =10 points (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.5; 1 point), > or =2 pain episodes in last 24 h (HR = 2.2; 1 point), age > or =67 years (HR = 2.3; 1 point), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (HR = 4.2; 2 points), and prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (HR = 2.2; 1 point). Patients were classified into five categories of risk (p = 0.0001): 0 points, 0% event rate; 1 point, 3.1%; 2 points, 5.4%; 3 points, 17.6%; > or =4 points, 29.6%. The accuracy of the score was greater than that of the TIMI risk score for the primary (C index of 0.78 vs. 0.66, p = 0.0002) and secondary (C index of 0.70 vs. 0.66, p = 0.1) end points.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with chest pain despite no ST-segment deviation or troponin elevation show a non-negligible rate of events at one year. A risk score derived from this specific population allows more accurate stratification than when using the TIMI risk score.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为胸痛、非ST段偏移心电图(ECG)且肌钙蛋白水平正常的患者制定一个风险评分。

背景

对该人群的预后评估仍然是一项挑战。

方法

通过临床病史(根据疼痛特征的危险因素和胸痛评分)、ECG及早期运动试验对总共646例连续患者进行评估。ST段偏移和肌钙蛋白升高为排除标准。主要终点为1年时的死亡率或心肌梗死。次要终点为14天时的死亡率、心肌梗死或紧急血运重建(类似于心肌梗死溶栓治疗[TIMI]风险评分)。

结果

主要和次要终点发生率分别为6.7%和5.4%。使用与主要终点相关的变量构建了一个风险评分:胸痛评分≥10分(风险比[HR]=2.5;1分)、过去24小时内≥2次疼痛发作(HR=2.2;1分)、年龄≥67岁(HR=2.3;1分)、胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(HR=4.2;2分)以及既往经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(HR=2.2;1分)。患者被分为五类风险(p=0.0001):0分,事件发生率为0%;1分,3.1%;2分,5.4%;3分,17.6%;≥4分,29.6%。该评分对于主要终点(C指数为0.78对0.66,p=0.0002)和次要终点(C指数为0.70对0.66,p=0.1)的准确性高于TIMI风险评分。

结论

尽管无ST段偏移或肌钙蛋白升高但出现胸痛的患者在1年时的事件发生率不可忽略。源自这一特定人群的风险评分比使用TIMI风险评分能实现更准确的分层。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验