• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分与以潜在急性冠脉综合征就诊于急诊科患者的一年预后的关系。

Relation between thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score and one-year outcomes for patients presenting at the emergency department with potential acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 15;105(4):441-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.015. Epub 2010 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.015
PMID:20152236
Abstract

The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score, derived from unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction patient population, predicts 14-day cardiovascular events. It has been validated in emergency department (ED) patients with potential acute coronary syndrome with respect to 30-day outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether the initial TIMI score could risk stratify ED patients with potential acute coronary syndrome with respect to the 1-year outcomes. This was a prospective cohort study of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain who underwent electrocardiography. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (acute myocardial infarction) were excluded. Follow-up was conducted by telephone and record review >1 year after the index visit. The main outcome was the 1-year mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or revascularization stratified by the TIMI score. Of 2,819 patients, 253 (9%) met the composite outcome. The overall incidence of the composite 1-year outcome of death (n = 119), acute myocardial infarction (n = 96), and revascularization (n = 90) according to TIMI score was TIMI 0 (n = 1,162), 4%; TIMI 1 (n = 901), 8%; TIMI 2 (n = 495), 13%; TIMI 3 (n = 193), 23%; TIMI 4 (n = 60), 28%; and TIMI 5 to 7 (n = 8), 88% (p <0.001). In conclusion, in addition to risk stratifying ED patients with chest pain at the initial ED evaluation, the TIMI score can also predict the 1-year cardiovascular events in this patient population.

摘要

心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)评分源自不稳定型心绞痛/非 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者人群,可预测 14 天心血管事件。该评分已在急诊科(ED)有潜在急性冠状动脉综合征的患者中进行了验证,可预测 30 天结局。我们的目的是确定初始 TIMI 评分是否可以对 ED 有潜在急性冠状动脉综合征的患者进行风险分层,预测 1 年结局。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了因胸痛就诊于 ED 并接受心电图检查的患者。排除 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(急性心肌梗死)患者。通过电话和记录回顾进行随访,随访时间超过指数就诊后 1 年。主要结局为 1 年死亡率、非致死性急性心肌梗死或血运重建,根据 TIMI 评分进行分层。在 2819 例患者中,253 例(9%)符合复合结局。根据 TIMI 评分,全因死亡(n = 119)、急性心肌梗死(n = 96)和血运重建(n = 90)的 1 年复合结局发生率如下:TIMI 0(n = 1162),4%;TIMI 1(n = 901),8%;TIMI 2(n = 495),13%;TIMI 3(n = 193),23%;TIMI 4(n = 60),28%;TIMI 5-7(n = 8),88%(p<0.001)。总之,TIMI 评分不仅可在 ED 初始评估时对胸痛的 ED 患者进行风险分层,还可预测该患者人群的 1 年心血管事件。

相似文献

1
Relation between thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score and one-year outcomes for patients presenting at the emergency department with potential acute coronary syndrome.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分与以潜在急性冠脉综合征就诊于急诊科患者的一年预后的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 15;105(4):441-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.015. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
2
Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population.急诊科胸痛患者中心肌梗死溶栓风险评分的前瞻性验证
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;48(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.032. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
3
Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population.将不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的TIMI风险评分应用于未经筛选的急诊科胸痛患者群体。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):13-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.031. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
4
Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证改良的心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分在急诊科胸痛且可能为急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x.
5
Relationship between pain severity and outcomes in patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndromes.疼痛严重程度与疑似急性冠脉综合征患者结局的关系。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;58(6):501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.05.036. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
6
Application of the TIMI risk score in ED patients with cocaine-associated chest pain.TIMI风险评分在急诊科可卡因相关性胸痛患者中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;25(9):1015-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.004.
7
Chest pain presenting to the Emergency Department--to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI?因胸痛就诊于急诊科——采用GRACE评分还是TIMI评分来分层风险?
Resuscitation. 2007 Jul;74(1):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.11.023. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
8
New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score.急性胸痛、非ST段偏移且肌钙蛋白浓度正常患者的新风险评分:与TIMI风险评分的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.037.
9
Prospective evaluation of the use of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score as a risk stratification tool for chest pain patients admitted to an ED observation unit.前瞻性评估心肌梗死溶栓评分作为胸痛患者收入 ED 观察单元的风险分层工具的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
10
Can a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score outperform the original for risk stratifying emergency department patients with chest pain?改良的心肌梗死溶栓风险评分在对胸痛急诊患者进行风险分层时能否优于原始评分?
Emerg Med J. 2009 Feb;26(2):95-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.058495.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase Versus Streptokinase in the Management of Myocardial Infarction in Developing Countries.替奈普酶与链激酶在发展中国家心肌梗死治疗中疗效与安全性的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Aug 25;15(8):e44125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44125. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Prognostic values of 4 risk scores in Chinese patients with chest pain: Prospective 2-centre cohort study.4种风险评分对中国胸痛患者的预后价值:前瞻性双中心队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e4778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004778.
3
Discrepancy between clinician and research assistant in TIMI score calculation (TRIAGED CPU).
临床医生与研究助理在TIMI评分计算(分诊CPU)方面的差异。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21685. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
4
Relationship between body mass index and prognosis of patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndromes.体重指数与潜在急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的关系。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):904-10. doi: 10.1111/acem.12211.