Fjell Anders M, Walhovd Kristine B
Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, P.B. 1094 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Neurobiol Aging. 2005 Oct;26(9):1297-9; discussion 1301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.02.018.
In their interesting paper, Daffner et al. [Daffner KR, Ryan KK, Williams DM, Budson AE, Rentz DM, Scinto LFM, et al. Age-related differences in novelty and target processing among cognitively healthy high performing adults. Neurobiol Aging 2005;26:1283-95] argue that previous studies have found changes in ERP components in response to novel and target stimuli due to two methodological factors: (1) lack of control for differences in level of cognitive status between age groups, and (2) not controlling for a non-specific age-related processing difference for all stimulus types (standards, targets, and novel). The questions raised by Daffner et al. are interesting, but based on existing literature, their conclusion seems premature. In the following, we will present examples from empirical literature as well as re-analyses of some of our own work to illustrate problematic aspects of Daffner et al.'s position.
在他们那篇有趣的论文中,达夫纳等人[达夫纳KR、瑞安KK、威廉姆斯DM、巴德森AE、伦茨DM、斯金托LFM等。认知健康的高绩效成年人中新颖性和目标处理的年龄差异。《神经生物学衰老》2005年;26:1283 - 95]认为,先前的研究发现,由于两个方法学因素,ERP成分在对新颖和目标刺激的反应中发生了变化:(1) 未对年龄组之间认知状态水平的差异进行控制,以及(2) 未对所有刺激类型(标准刺激、目标刺激和新颖刺激)的非特异性年龄相关处理差异进行控制。达夫纳等人提出的问题很有趣,但基于现有文献,他们的结论似乎为时过早。在接下来的内容中,我们将展示实证文献中的例子以及对我们自己一些工作的重新分析,以说明达夫纳等人观点中存在问题的方面。