Talsma Durk, Kok Albert, Ridderinkhof K Richard
Cognitive Psychology Department, Vrije Universiteit, Van den Boechorststraat 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Nov;62(2):249-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
To assess selective attention processes in young and old adults, behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures were recorded. Streams of visual stimuli were presented from left or right locations (Experiment 1) or from a central location and comprising two different spatial frequencies (Experiment 2). In both experiments, results were compared in visual-only and visual+auditory stimulus context conditions. Participants were forced to respond fast in both experiments, while maintaining high accuracy. In Experiment 1, no behavioral effects of aging were found; however, an enlargement of the N1 component in the older age group suggested that older adults initial selection process was larger than that of young adults. A late frontal effect following the P300 elicited by attended non-targets was larger in the visual+auditory condition than in the visual-only condition in the old age group. This effect was interpreted as reflecting a memory update of the relevant target location. In Experiment 2, older adults made relatively more errors in the visual+auditory condition than in visual-only condition, more so than the young adults. Older adults' ERP data were also characterized by an enlargement of the occipital selection negativity, compared to the young age group. In contrast to experiment 1, no late frontal post-P3 effect could be found, suggesting that the memory trace of the relevant stimulus feature was updated less frequently, explaining the reduction in response accuracy in the visual+auditory stimulus context conditions.
为评估年轻人和老年人的选择性注意过程,记录了行为和事件相关电位(ERP)指标。视觉刺激流从左侧或右侧位置呈现(实验1),或从中央位置呈现并包含两种不同的空间频率(实验2)。在两个实验中,均在仅视觉和视觉+听觉刺激背景条件下比较结果。参与者在两个实验中都被迫快速做出反应,同时保持高准确率。在实验1中,未发现衰老的行为效应;然而,老年组中N1成分增大表明老年人的初始选择过程比年轻人更大。在老年组中,由被关注的非目标诱发的P300之后的晚期额叶效应在视觉+听觉条件下比仅视觉条件下更大。这种效应被解释为反映了相关目标位置的记忆更新。在实验2中,老年人在视觉+听觉条件下比仅视觉条件下犯的错误相对更多,比年轻人更明显。与年轻组相比,老年人的ERP数据还表现为枕叶选择负波增大。与实验1不同,未发现P3之后的晚期额叶效应,这表明相关刺激特征的记忆痕迹更新频率较低,解释了在视觉+听觉刺激背景条件下反应准确率的降低。