• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将经济评估纳入决策制定:安大略省的经验。

Incorporating economic evaluations into decision-making: the Ontario experience.

作者信息

Laupacis Andreas

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Centre, and the Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Med Care. 2005 Jul;43(7 Suppl):15-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000170002.90751.1a.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000170002.90751.1a
PMID:16056004
Abstract

The Drug Quality and Therapeutics Committee (DQTC) and the Canadian Expert Drug Assessment Committee (CEDAC) make reimbursement recommendations to publicly funded outpatient drug plans in Ontario and Canada respectively. In this article, the organization and decision-making processes of these committees are described. Issues associated with these committees such as potential biases associated with pharmaceutical company submissions, transparency, restricted access programs, conditional listing, and price negotiation are discussed.

摘要

药物质量与治疗学委员会(DQTC)和加拿大专家药物评估委员会(CEDAC)分别向安大略省和加拿大的公共资助门诊药物计划提出报销建议。本文描述了这些委员会的组织和决策过程。讨论了与这些委员会相关的问题,如与制药公司提交材料相关的潜在偏见、透明度、受限获取计划、有条件上市和价格谈判等。

相似文献

1
Incorporating economic evaluations into decision-making: the Ontario experience.将经济评估纳入决策制定:安大略省的经验。
Med Care. 2005 Jul;43(7 Suppl):15-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000170002.90751.1a.
2
Ontario's formulary committee: how recommendations are made.安大略省药品目录委员会:建议是如何制定的。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(4):285-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321040-00006.
3
Reimbursement-Based Economics--What Is It and How Can We Use It to Inform Drug Policy Reform?基于补偿的经济学——它是什么,以及我们如何利用它为药物政策改革提供信息?
Headache. 2015 Jul-Aug;55 Suppl 4:236-47. doi: 10.1111/head.12585. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
4
The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond.经济证据在加拿大肿瘤学报销决策中的作用:从拉姆达到更远。
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):771-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00298.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
5
Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions.运用药物经济学分析进行药品保险覆盖范围决策。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 2):119-26. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00011.
6
Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.利用有效性和成本效益来做出药物覆盖范围决策:英国、澳大利亚和加拿大的比较
JAMA. 2009 Oct 7;302(13):1437-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1409.
7
National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.国家癌症新药报销目录的决定因素:对2007 - 2016年韩国58项癌症治疗评估的回顾性分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):401-409. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1276828. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
8
Health economic evaluations in reimbursement decision making in the Netherlands: time to take it seriously?荷兰报销决策中的卫生经济评估:是时候认真对待了吗?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
9
Economic evaluation of drugs and its potential uses in policy making.药物的经济评估及其在政策制定中的潜在用途。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Sep;8(3):190-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508030-00003.
10
Priority setting for pharmaceuticals. The use of health economic evidence by reimbursement and clinical guidance committees.药品的优先级设定。报销和临床指南委员会对卫生经济证据的使用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Feb;5(1):28-35. doi: 10.1007/s10198-003-0195-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.在一项具有全国代表性的横断面调查中,健康状况影响因基于偏好的健康指数而有很大差异。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Feb;36(2):264-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15599546. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
2
Burden of disease and economic evaluation of healthcare interventions: are we investigating what really matters?疾病负担与卫生干预经济评价:我们是否在研究真正重要的问题?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 13;11:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-75.
3
Family physician attitudes about prescribing using a drug formulary.
家庭医生对使用药品处方集开药的态度。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Oct 16;10:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-69.
4
Is There a Tension between Clinical Practice and Reimbursement Policy? The Case of Osteoarthritis Prescribing Practices in Ontario.临床实践与报销政策之间是否存在矛盾?安大略省骨关节炎处方实践的案例。
Healthc Policy. 2007 Nov;3(2):e128-44.
5
Clearing up the hazy road from bench to bedside: a framework for integrating the fourth hurdle into translational medicine.厘清从实验台到临床应用的模糊之路:将第四道障碍融入转化医学的框架
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 24;8:194. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-194.
6
Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review.已发表的成本效益研究中的偏倚:系统评价
BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):699-703. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38737.607558.80. Epub 2006 Feb 22.