Paydaş Saime, Balal M, Sertdemir Y, Seyrek N, Karayaylali I
Department of Nephrology, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Ren Fail. 2005;27(4):409-13.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of CyA monitoring using C0 monitoring (fasting level after 12 h from last dose), and C2 monitoring (2 h after morning dose) on renal functions, lipid levels, CyA levels, and daily dosages of CyA in renal transplanted patients in the posttransplant period from the first month to the 36th month. In our center between 1992-2003, 37 of the 54 renal transplanted patients were treated with CyA, prednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. The mean age was 32.36 +/-10.32 and 35.00 +/- 10.23 (p = 0.39) in C0 (M/F: 18/7) and in C2 (9/3), respectively. Cadaveric donor (d), living related d, and living unrelated d were in four patients (p), 17 p and four p in C0, and two p, seven p, and three p in C2, respectively (p = 0.79). Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) developed in 13 p (52%) and one p (8.3%) in C0 and in C2, respectively (p =0.013). Creatinine clearance values were 72.31 +/- 23.10 mL/min and 78.73 +/- 22.42 mL/min (p:0.621) at first month, 64.97 +/- 22.58 mL/min and 78.00 +/- 19.90 mL/min (p:0.065) at sixth month, 56.50 +/- 19.62 mL/min and 76.62 +/- 21.06 mL/min (p:0.006) at 12th month, 50.28 +/- 24.79 mL/min and 80.87 +/- 18.24 mL/min (p < 0.001) at 24th month, and 55.15 +/- 19.21 mL/min and 86.65 +/- 14.97 mL/min (p:0.004) at 36th month in C0 and C2, respectively. The mean daily dosages of CyA were 354.35 +/- 122.63 and 266.67 +/- 64.95 mg/d (p:0.031) at first month, 277.17 +/- 77.94 and 250.00 +/- 73.31 mg/d (p:0.228) at sixth month, 247.92 +/- 58.48 and 211.36 +/- 62.61 mg/ d (p:0.09) at 12th month, 232.95 +/- 56.90 and 170.45 +/- 41.56 mg/ d (p:0.003) at 24th month, and 240.63 +/- 52.34 and 153.57 +/- 46.61 mg/d (p:0.002) at 36th month in C0 and C2, respectively. In C2, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, uric acid, total cholesterol (C), LDL-C, and triglyceride levels were lower than those monitored with C0. In C2, HDL-C levels were also higher than those monitored with C0. None of these patients returned to dialysis or died in this period. In conclusion, during the first 36 months with monitoring C2, preservation of renal function, control of blood pressure serum lipids and uric acid were better than those with monitoring C0. In addition, daily dose of CyA was lower in C2 method and, at the same time, this effect of C2 can be accepted as cost effective.
本研究的目的是评估在肾移植患者术后第1个月至第36个月期间,采用谷浓度监测(末次给药12小时后的空腹血药浓度)和2小时血药浓度监测(早晨给药后2小时)对环孢素(CyA)进行监测,对肾功能、血脂水平、CyA血药浓度及CyA每日剂量的影响。1992年至2003年期间,在我们中心,54例肾移植患者中的37例接受了CyA、泼尼松龙及霉酚酸酯或硫唑嘌呤治疗。谷浓度监测组(C0组,男性/女性:18/7)和2小时血药浓度监测组(C2组,男性/女性:9/3)的平均年龄分别为32.36±10.32岁和35.00±10.23岁(p = 0.39)。C0组中4例患者(p)的供体为尸体供肾(d)、17例患者的供体为亲属活体供肾、4例患者的供体为非亲属活体供肾;C2组中2例患者的供体为尸体供肾、7例患者的供体为亲属活体供肾、3例患者的供体为非亲属活体供肾(p = 0.79)。C0组和C2组分别有13例患者(52%)和1例患者(8.3%)发生慢性移植肾肾病(CAN)(p = 0.013)。第1个月时,C0组和C2组的肌酐清除率分别为72.31±23.10 mL/min和78.73±22.42 mL/min(p = 0.621);第6个月时,分别为64.97±22.58 mL/min和78.00±19.90 mL/min(p = 0.065);第12个月时,分别为56.50±19.62 mL/min和76.62±21.06 mL/min(p = 0.006);第24个月时,分别为50.28±24.79 mL/min和80.87±18.24 mL/min(p < 0.001);第36个月时,分别为55.15±19.21 mL/min和86.65±14.97 mL/min(p = 0.004)。C0组和C2组第1个月时CyA的平均每日剂量分别为354.35±122.63 mg/d和266.67±64.95 mg/d(p = 0.031);第6个月时,分别为277.17±77.94 mg/d和250.00±73.31 mg/d(p = 0.228);第12个月时,分别为247.92±58.48 mg/d和211.36±62.61 mg/d(p = 0.09);第24个月时,分别为232.95±56.90 mg/d和170.45±41.56 mg/d(p = 0.003);第36个月时,分别为240.63±52.34 mg/d和153.57±46.61 mg/d(p = 0.002)。在C2组中,收缩压和舒张压、尿酸、总胆固醇(C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)及甘油三酯水平均低于C0组监测水平。在C2组中,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平也高于C0组监测水平。在此期间,这些患者均未恢复透析或死亡。总之,在术后36个月内,采用C2监测时,肾功能的保留、血压及血清脂质和尿酸的控制均优于采用C0监测时。此外,C2方法的CyA每日剂量较低,同时,C2方法的这种效果可被认为具有成本效益。