Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Kelm J, Reith W, Schwerdtfeger K, Steudel W I
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Oct;30(5):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.05.011.
The purpose of this prospective randomised study was to evaluate which operative technique for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome is preferable: subcutaneous anterior transposition or nerve decompression without transposition. This study included 66 patients suffering from pain and/or neurological deficits with clinically and electromyographically proven cubital tunnel syndrome. Thirty-two patients underwent nerve decompression without transposition and 34 underwent subcutaneous transposition of the nerve. Follow-up examinations evaluating pain, motor and sensory deficits as well as motor nerve conduction velocities, were performed 3 and 9 months postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the outcomes of the two groups at either postoperative follow-up examination. We recommend simple decompression of the nerve in cases without deformity of the elbow, as this is the less invasive operative procedure.
皮下前路转位术还是不进行转位的神经减压术。本研究纳入了66例患有疼痛和/或神经功能缺损且经临床和肌电图证实为肘管综合征的患者。32例患者接受了不进行转位的神经减压术,34例患者接受了神经皮下转位术。术后3个月和9个月进行随访检查,评估疼痛、运动和感觉功能缺损以及运动神经传导速度。在两次术后随访检查中,两组的结果均无显著差异。对于肘部无畸形的病例,我们建议进行简单的神经减压术,因为这是侵入性较小的手术操作。