• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺神经前置术与单纯减压术治疗肘管综合征的长期疗效比较——一项前瞻性研究

Comparison of the long-term results of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve or simple decompression in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome--a prospective study.

作者信息

Keiner Dörthe, Gaab Michael R, Schroeder Henry W S, Oertel Joachim

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Universitaetsklinikum, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Apr;151(4):311-5; discussion 316. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0218-4. Epub 2009 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-009-0218-4
PMID:19277463
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In order to assess their late benefits we present the long-term results of a comparison of treating cubital tunnel syndrome with anterior submuscular transposition or simple decompression.

METHODS

Of 40 patients initially recruited to this study 33 were available for long term follow-up. Sixteen patients underwent anterior submuscular transposition (group A); simple decompression was performed in 17 of the patients (group B). The indications for inclusion were a typical clinical presentation confirmed by abnormal nerve conduction studies. The mean duration of the symptoms before operation was 13 months (range 2 to 84 months) in group A and 8.4 months (range 1.5 to 36 months) in group B. All patients were seen 2 months after surgery and at least 3 years later. The mean duration of follow-up was 63.1 month in the first group and 52 months in the second group.

RESULTS

No complications were seen in either group. In the group treated by anterior transposition, ten of 16 patients were completely free of signs and symptoms; slight residual hypesthesia or paresthesia was observed in two patients. Paresis and atrophy was observed in only one person. In the simple decompression group, 11 of 17 patients were completely free of signs and symptoms. In five patients slight residual symptoms were observed; no paresis or atrophy was reported in any of this group.

CONCLUSION

These long-term results show that both surgical techniques have a good outcome. Thus, the less invasive simple decompression should be preferred.

摘要

目的

为了评估其远期疗效,我们展示了一项比较采用肌下前置术或单纯减压术治疗肘管综合征的长期结果。

方法

最初招募到本研究的40例患者中,33例可供长期随访。16例患者接受了肌下前置术(A组);17例患者进行了单纯减压术(B组)。纳入标准为典型临床表现并经异常神经传导研究证实。A组术前症状平均持续时间为13个月(范围2至84个月),B组为8.4个月(范围1.5至36个月)。所有患者均在术后2个月及至少3年后接受检查。第一组平均随访时间为63.1个月,第二组为�2个月。

结果

两组均未出现并发症。在肌下前置术治疗组中,16例患者中有10例完全没有体征和症状;2例患者有轻微残留感觉减退或感觉异常。仅1例患者出现轻瘫和萎缩。在单纯减压组中,17例患者中有11例完全没有体征和症状。5例患者有轻微残留症状;该组未报告有轻瘫或萎缩病例。

结论

这些长期结果表明,两种手术技术都有良好的疗效。因此,应首选侵入性较小的单纯减压术。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the long-term results of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve or simple decompression in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome--a prospective study.尺神经前置术与单纯减压术治疗肘管综合征的长期疗效比较——一项前瞻性研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Apr;151(4):311-5; discussion 316. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0218-4. Epub 2009 Mar 7.
2
Cubital tunnel syndrome. Treatment by decompression without transposition of ulnar nerve.肘管综合征。不进行尺神经转位的减压治疗。
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002 Sep;45(3):164-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34394.
3
Recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome. Etiology and treatment.复发性肘管综合征。病因与治疗。
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2001 Dec;44(4):197-201. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-19937.
4
Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.单纯减压术与尺神经前皮下及肌下转位术治疗肘管综合征的Meta分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Oct;33(8):1314.e1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.03.006.
5
[Effectiveness comparison between two different methods of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome].两种不同尺神经前置方法治疗肘管综合征的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;26(4):429-32.
6
Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.针对肘管综合征的单纯减压或尺神经皮下前移术。
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Oct;30(5):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.05.011.
7
[Anatomical changes and dynamic analysis after anterior submuscular transposition in treating cubital tunnel syndrome].[前肌下转位治疗肘管综合征后的解剖学变化及动态分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Jul;18(4):254-6.
8
Comparative clinical outcomes of submuscular and subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.尺神经肘管综合征行尺神经肌下转位与皮下转位的临床疗效比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 May-Jun;34(5):866-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.008.
9
Decompression of the ulnar nerve and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision for cubital tunnel syndrome: comparison with anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve.小切口减压联合最小化尺骨鹰嘴切除术治疗肘管综合征:与神经前皮下转位术的比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jul;63(7):1150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.09.018. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
10
[Decompression and anterior transposition of ulnar nerve with inferior ulnar collateral artery for cubital tunnel syndrome].[尺神经减压并与尺侧下副动脉一起向前移位治疗肘管综合征]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Sep;22(9):1044-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on cubital tunnel syndrome.关于肘管综合征被引用次数最多的100篇文章的文献计量分析。
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 19;64:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.012. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Higher Revision Rates With In Situ Decompression as Compared to Ulnar Nerve Transposition for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Regression Analysis.与尺神经移位术相比,原位减压术治疗肘管综合征的翻修率更高:一项Meta回归分析
Cureus. 2024 Aug 29;16(8):e68116. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68116. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
肘管综合征的手术治疗:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop. 2024 Feb 28;53:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.041. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Endoscopic Anterior Transposition of Ulnar Nerve (EATUN) for Treatment of Tardy Ulnar Nerve Palsy.内镜下尺神经前置术(EATUN)治疗迟发性尺神经麻痹
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Mar 12;55(2):478-483. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00366-w. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.不同肘管减压手术技术的安全性和结局:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24352.
6
Is simple decompression enough for the treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome: A prospective comparative study analyzing the outcomes of simple decompression versus partial medial epicondylectomy.单纯减压术治疗特发性肘管综合征是否足够:一项前瞻性对比研究,分析单纯减压术与部分内侧髁切除术的疗效。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(3):523-531. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.74400.
7
Novel minimally invasive technique in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.治疗肘管综合征的新型微创技术。
J Spine Surg. 2019 Mar;5(1):88-96. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.03.02.
8
Ulnar Nerve In Situ Decompression versus Transposition for Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis.原位减压与移位治疗特发性肘管综合征的尺神经:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Hand Microsurg. 2019 Apr;11(1):18-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670928. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
Surgical Approaches and Their Outcomes in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.尺神经沟综合征治疗中的手术方法及其疗效
Front Surg. 2018 Jul 26;5:48. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00048. eCollection 2018.
10
SUBCUTANEOUS ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION FOR TREATMENT OF CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: IS THIS METHOD SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?皮下前路转位术治疗肘管综合征:该方法安全有效吗?
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 4;47(6):748-53. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30033-1. eCollection 2012.