Suppr超能文献

甲状腺触诊引导和图像引导下细针穿刺活检的诊断准确性

Diagnostic accuracy of palpation-guided and image-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid.

作者信息

Goudy Steven L, Flynn Michael B

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinic, Iowa City, USA.

出版信息

Ear Nose Throat J. 2005 Jun;84(6):371-4.

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of traditional palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) performed by clinicians and pathologists with that of image-guided FNAB performed by radiologists for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. We reviewed the medical records of 89 patients who had undergone thyroid FNAB and subsequent surgical excision and pathology. Of this group, 58 patients had undergone palpation-guided FNAB performed by a clinician, 20 had undergone palpation-guided FNAB performed by a pathologist, and 11 had undergone image-guided FNAB performed by a radiologist. The sensitivity of the three techniques was 86, 100, and 100%, respectively, and the specificity was 78, 94, and 44%; there were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity or specificity among the three groups. Our data indicate that FNAB of the thyroid can be performed with equal reliability by clinicians, pathologists, and radiologists.

摘要

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以比较临床医生和病理学家进行的传统触诊引导下细针穿刺活检(FNAB)与放射科医生进行的影像引导下FNAB在评估甲状腺结节时的敏感性和特异性。我们回顾了89例接受甲状腺FNAB及后续手术切除和病理检查的患者的病历。在这组患者中,58例由临床医生进行了触诊引导下FNAB,20例由病理学家进行了触诊引导下FNAB,11例由放射科医生进行了影像引导下FNAB。这三种技术的敏感性分别为86%、100%和100%,特异性分别为78%、94%和44%;三组之间在敏感性或特异性方面无统计学显著差异。我们的数据表明,临床医生、病理学家和放射科医生进行甲状腺FNAB的可靠性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验