Suppr超能文献

触诊与超声引导下细针抽吸活检诊断甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of palpation versus ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosis of malignancy in thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Metabolic, Cardiovascular and Aging Cluster, The Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jul 17;22(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01085-5.

Abstract

Thyroid nodule is a common health problem in endocrinology. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytology performed by palpation guided FNAB (PGFNAB) and ultrasound-guided FNAB (USGFNAB) are the preferred examinations for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer and part of the integration of the current thyroid nodule assessment. Although studies have shown USGFNAB to be more accurate than PGFNAB, inconsistencies from several studies and clinical guidelines still exist.The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Palpation versus Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in diagnosing malignancy of thyroid nodules.The systematic review and meta-analysis were prepared based on the PRISMA standards. Literature searches were carried out on three online databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Proquest) and grey literatures. Data extraction was carried out manually from various studies that met the eligibility, followed by analysis to obtain pooled data on sensitivity, specificity, Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR) and Area Under Curve (AUC), and the comparison of the two methods.Total of 2517 articles were obtained, with 11 studies were included in this systematic review. The total sample was 2382, including 1128 subjects using PGFNAB and 1254 subjects using USGFNAB. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 with mild-moderate results. The results of sensitivity, specificity, AUC and DOR in diagnosing thyroid nodules using PGFNAB were 76% (95% CI, 49-89%), 77% (95% CI, 56-95%), 0.827 and 11.6 (95% CI, 6-21) respectively. The results of sensitivity, specificity, AUC and DOR in diagnosing thyroid nodules using USGFNAB were 90% (95% CI, 81-95%), 80% (95% CI, 66-89%), 0.92 and 40 (95% CI, 23-69), respectively the results of the comparison test between PGFNAB and USGFNAB; Tsens USGFNAB of 0.99 (p = 0.023), AUC difference test of 0.093 (p = 0.000023).The diagnostic accuracy of USGFNAB is higher than PGFNAB in diagnosing malignancy of thyroid nodules. If it is accessible, the author recommends using USGFNAB as a diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules.

摘要

甲状腺结节是内分泌学中的常见健康问题。触诊引导下的甲状腺细针抽吸活检(PGFNAB)和超声引导下的甲状腺细针抽吸活检(USGFNAB)是诊断甲状腺癌的首选检查方法,也是当前甲状腺结节评估的一部分。虽然研究表明 USGFNAB 比 PGFNAB 更准确,但来自几项研究和临床指南的结果仍存在不一致。本研究旨在比较触诊与超声引导下细针抽吸活检在诊断甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤中的诊断准确性。本系统评价和荟萃分析是根据 PRISMA 标准准备的。文献检索在三个在线数据库(Pubmed/MEDLINE、Embase 和 Proquest)和灰色文献中进行。手动从符合入选标准的各种研究中提取数据,然后进行分析,以获得敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)的汇总数据,并比较两种方法。共获得 2517 篇文章,其中 11 项研究纳入本系统评价。总样本量为 2382 例,其中 1128 例使用 PGFNAB,1254 例使用 USGFNAB。使用 QUADAS-2 评估偏倚风险,结果为轻度至中度。使用 PGFNAB 诊断甲状腺结节的敏感性、特异性、AUC 和 DOR 分别为 76%(95%CI,49-89%)、77%(95%CI,56-95%)、0.827 和 11.6(95%CI,6-21)。使用 USGFNAB 诊断甲状腺结节的敏感性、特异性、AUC 和 DOR 分别为 90%(95%CI,81-95%)、80%(95%CI,66-89%)、0.92 和 40(95%CI,23-69%),PGFNAB 和 USGFNAB 比较检验结果;Tsens USGFNAB 为 0.99(p=0.023),AUC 差异检验为 0.093(p=0.000023)。USGFNAB 诊断甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤的准确性高于 PGFNAB。如果可行,作者建议将 USGFNAB 作为甲状腺结节的诊断工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3207/9290285/7a763bb26eae/12902_2022_1085_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验