• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开胸术后使用单根硅橡胶胸腔引流管:初步评估

Use of a single silastic chest drain following thoracotomy: initial evaluation.

作者信息

Kejriwal Nand K, Newman Mark A J

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2005 Aug;75(8):710-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03479.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03479.x
PMID:16076338
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is standard practice to use multiple large bore semi-rigid chest tubes to drain the pleural cavity following thoracic procedures. These can cause pain and discomfort at the insertion site.

METHODS

We describe our experience with the use of a single small silastic drain following thoracotomy. From November 2001 to November 2003, size 19-F silastic chest tubes (Blake drains) were used for drainage of the pleural cavity in 37 patients at our institution. The patients ranged in age from 18 to 81 years (mean 65). The operations included 22 lobectomies, two bilobectomies, 10 wedge resections, and three other procedures.

RESULTS

Total drainage in each patient ranged from 420 to 5440 mL (mean 1387 mL). Tubes were left in place for an average of 4.3 days (range 1-12). The average postoperative length of stay was 7.6 days (range 3-44, median 5). Three patients required insertion of an additional tube for dislodgement, persistent air leak, and bronchopleural fistula, respectively. These complications occurred among the first 15 patients in the present series. None of the patients had persistent pleural effusion. Subjectively, these tubes were more comfortable for the patients and were easier to remove.

SUMMARY

The use of a single, small silastic chest drains following thoracotomy may be safe and effective in draining both fluid and air, though an additional tube may be necessary for persistent leaks.

摘要

背景

在胸部手术后使用多个大口径半刚性胸管引流胸腔是标准做法。这些胸管会在插入部位引起疼痛和不适。

方法

我们描述了在开胸术后使用单个小硅胶引流管的经验。2001年11月至2003年11月,我们机构对37例患者使用19F硅胶胸管(布雷克引流管)引流胸腔。患者年龄在18至81岁之间(平均65岁)。手术包括22例肺叶切除术、2例双肺叶切除术、10例楔形切除术和3例其他手术。

结果

每位患者的总引流量在420至5440毫升之间(平均1387毫升)。引流管平均留置4.3天(范围1至12天)。术后平均住院时间为7.6天(范围3至44天,中位数5天)。3例患者分别因引流管移位、持续性漏气和支气管胸膜瘘需要额外插入一根引流管。这些并发症发生在本系列的前15例患者中。没有患者出现持续性胸腔积液。主观上,这些引流管对患者来说更舒适,且更容易拔除。

总结

开胸术后使用单个小硅胶胸管引流液体和气体可能是安全有效的,尽管对于持续性漏气可能需要额外插入一根引流管。

相似文献

1
Use of a single silastic chest drain following thoracotomy: initial evaluation.开胸术后使用单根硅橡胶胸腔引流管:初步评估
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Aug;75(8):710-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03479.x.
2
A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases.楔形切除或肺叶切除术后单根24F Blake引流管:100例连续病例研究
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Oct;30(4):649-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.06.032. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
3
Efficacy of Blake drains for mediastinal and pleural drainage following cardiac operations.布雷克引流管在心脏手术后纵隔及胸腔引流中的疗效
J Card Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):574-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.00138.x.
4
A proposal for management after lung resection, using a flexible silastic drain.使用可弯曲硅橡胶引流管进行肺切除术后管理的建议。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2010 Oct;18(5):435-42. doi: 10.1177/0218492310380499.
5
The use of flexible silastic drains after chest surgery: novel thoracic drainage.胸部手术后使用柔性硅橡胶引流管:新型胸腔引流
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jan;81(1):331-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.102.
6
Routine underwater seal drains are not required after transthoracic oesophagectomy: a pilot study.经胸段食管癌切除术后无需常规放置胸腔闭式引流管:一项初步研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Apr;35(4):694-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.11.018. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
7
Comparison of three different chest drainages after coronary artery bypass surgery--a randomised trial in 150 patients.冠状动脉搭桥术后三种不同胸腔引流方式的比较——一项针对150例患者的随机试验
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):372-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.027. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
8
The use of Blake drains following general thoracic surgery: is it an acceptable option?普通胸外科手术后使用 Blake 引流管:这是一个可接受的选择吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Jan;8(1):58-61. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.188086. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
9
Fast-tracking pulmonary resections.快速推进肺切除术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Aug;122(2):318-24. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.114352.
10
Silastic drains vs conventional chest tubes after coronary artery bypass.冠状动脉搭桥术后硅橡胶引流管与传统胸管的比较
Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):108-13. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.108.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of the coaxial smart drain in patients with a large air leak following anatomic lung resection: a prospective multicenter phase II analysis of efficacy and safety.同轴智能引流管在解剖性肺切除术后存在大量漏气患者中的应用:一项关于疗效和安全性的前瞻性多中心II期分析
J Vis Surg. 2018 Jan 29;4:26. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.01.07. eCollection 2018.
2
Liver injury secondary to chest tube placement: a case report of conservative management and review of literature.胸腔闭式引流管置入继发肝损伤:保守治疗病例报告及文献复习
Clin Case Rep. 2017 Nov 22;6(1):45-48. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1280. eCollection 2018 Jan.
3
The Redax Coaxial Drain in pulmonary lobectomy: a study of efficacy.
雷达克斯同轴引流管在肺叶切除术中的应用:疗效研究
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep;9(9):3215-3221. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.110.
4
Novel Split Chest Tube Improves Post-Surgical Thoracic Drainage.新型分体式胸管改善术后胸腔引流
J Clin Exp Cardiolog. 2014;5. doi: 10.4172/2155-9880.1000321.