Younger Jarred, Kemmerer David D, Winkel Justin D, Nash Michael R
Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2005 Jul;53(3):306-20. doi: 10.1080/00207140590961411.
Whereas early studies have found moderately high agreement between self- and observer-rated scores on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A), these studies shared a common confound in that participants were aware of being directly observed. In the present study, confederates made surreptitious observations of group participants' hypnotic responding. Following the hypnotic procedure, participants indicated whether or not they remembered each item and provided self-reports of their hypnotic response. The study assesses the accuracy of participant self-report for hypnosis items when individuals are unaware of being observed. Thirty-two percent of participants failed to recognize at least one item from the hypnosis session, suggesting that the inability to remember items is a common phenomenon. When participants reported not remembering an item, the accuracy of their self-reported response was no better than chance.
早期研究发现，在哈佛团体催眠易感性量表A式（HGSHS:A）上，自我评分与观察者评分之间存在适度的高度一致性，但这些研究存在一个共同的混淆因素，即参与者意识到自己正在被直接观察。在本研究中，同伙对团体参与者的催眠反应进行了秘密观察。在催眠程序之后，参与者指出他们是否记得每个项目，并提供他们催眠反应的自我报告。该研究评估了在个体未意识到被观察的情况下，参与者对催眠项目自我报告的准确性。32%的参与者未能识别出催眠过程中的至少一个项目，这表明无法记住项目是一种常见现象。当参与者报告不记得某个项目时，他们自我报告反应的准确性并不比随机猜测更好。
