• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

项目分析以提高内科本科客观结构化临床考试的可靠性。

Item analysis to improve reliability for an internal medicine undergraduate OSCE.

作者信息

Auewarakul Chirayu, Downing Steven M, Praditsuwan Rungnirand, Jaturatamrong Uapong

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(2):105-13. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-2315-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10459-005-2315-3
PMID:16078095
Abstract

Utilization of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) for final assessment of medical students in Internal Medicine requires a representative sample of OSCE stations. The reliability and generalizability of OSCE scores provides validity evidence for OSCE scores and supports its contribution to the final clinical grade of medical students. The objective of this study was to perform item analysis using OSCE stations as the unit of analysis and evaluate the extent to which OSCE score reliability can be improved using item analysis data. OSCE scores from eight cohorts of fourth-year medical students (n = 435) in a 6-year undergraduate program were analyzed. Generalizability (G) coefficients of OSCE scores were computed for each cohort. Item analysis was performed by considering each OSCE station as an item and computing the corrected item-total correlation. OSCE stations which negatively impacted the reliability were deleted and the G-coefficient was recalculated. The G-coefficients of OSCE scores from the eight cohorts ranged from 0.48 to 0.80 (median 0.62). The median number of OSCE stations that negatively impacted the G-coefficient was 3.5 (out of a median of 25 total stations). When the ''problem stations'' were deleted, the median G-coefficient across eight cohorts increased to 0.62--0.72. In conclusion, item analysis of OSCE stations is useful and should be performed to improve the reliability of total OSCE scores. Problem stations can then be identified and improved.

摘要

使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)对医学生内科实习进行最终评估需要有代表性的OSCE考站样本。OSCE分数的可靠性和可推广性为OSCE分数提供了效度证据,并支持其对医学生最终临床成绩的贡献。本研究的目的是以OSCE考站为分析单位进行项目分析,并评估利用项目分析数据可在多大程度上提高OSCE分数的可靠性。对一个6年制本科项目中八届四年级医学生(n = 435)的OSCE分数进行了分析。计算了每个队列的OSCE分数的概化(G)系数。通过将每个OSCE考站视为一个项目并计算校正后的项目与总分相关性来进行项目分析。删除对可靠性有负面影响的OSCE考站,并重新计算G系数。八届学生的OSCE分数的G系数范围为0.48至0.80(中位数为0.62)。对G系数有负面影响的OSCE考站的中位数为3.5个(总考站中位数为25个)。当删除“问题考站”后,八届学生的G系数中位数提高到0.62 - 0.72。总之,对OSCE考站进行项目分析是有用的,应该进行以提高OSCE总分的可靠性。然后可以识别并改进问题考站。

相似文献

1
Item analysis to improve reliability for an internal medicine undergraduate OSCE.项目分析以提高内科本科客观结构化临床考试的可靠性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(2):105-13. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-2315-3.
2
Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.在高风险的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估中,因素分析可以成为一种有用的标准设定工具。
Med Educ. 2004 Aug;38(8):825-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01821.x.
3
Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods.内科学生评估系统有效性证据的来源:评估方法的评价性研究
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):276-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02090.x.
4
Sharpening the eye of the OSCE with critical action analysis.通过关键行动分析提升客观结构化临床考试的敏锐度。
Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10):900-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181850990.
5
Assessment of first-year veterinary students' clinical skills using objective structured clinical examinations.使用客观结构化临床考试评估一年级兽医学生的临床技能。
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Winter;37(4):395-402. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.4.395.
6
Analysis of quality and feasibility of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in preclinical dental education.分析口腔医学基础教育中客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的质量和可行性。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2011 Aug;15(3):172-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00653.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
7
The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 1 scores.二年级医学生客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)成绩与美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)成绩之间的关系。
Med Teach. 2002 Sep;24(5):535-9. doi: 10.1080/0142159021000012586.
8
On the reliability of a dental OSCE, using SEM: effect of different days.使用结构方程模型评估口腔医学客观结构化临床考试的可靠性:不同日期的影响
Eur J Dent Educ. 2008 Aug;12(3):131-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00507.x.
9
Design and validation of 2 objective structured clinical examination stations to assess core undergraduate examination skills of the hand and knee.用于评估手部和膝部本科核心检查技能的2个客观结构化临床考试站的设计与验证
J Rheumatol. 2007 Feb;34(2):421-4.
10
Exploring the use of videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students.探索使用录像的客观结构化临床考试来评估医学生的关节检查技能。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun 15;57(5):869-76. doi: 10.1002/art.22763.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying generalized theory to optimize the quality of high-stakes objective structured clinical examinations for undergraduate medical students: experience from the French medical school.应用通用理论优化本科医学生高风险客观结构化临床考试的质量:来自法国医学院的经验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 2;25(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07255-y.
2
Perennial post-examination surprises.常年存在的考试后意外情况。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Sep;70(9):533-536. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7009533.
3
Psychometric analysis of Anatomy MCQs in Modular examination.
模块化考试中解剖学多项选择题的心理测量分析
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;33(5):1138-1143. doi: 10.12669/pjms.335.12382.
4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
5
Is Cronbach's alpha sufficient for assessing the reliability of the OSCE for an internal medicine course?克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)是否足以评估内科课程客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的可靠性?
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 19;8:582. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1533-x.
6
Experience of clinical skills assessment in the Busan-Gyeongnam Consortium.釜山-庆南联盟临床技能评估经验。
Korean J Med Educ. 2013 Dec;25(4):327-36. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2013.25.4.327. Epub 2013 Dec 31.