• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布洛芬用于心肌梗死二级预防时可能会消除阿司匹林的益处。

Ibuprofen may abrogate the benefits of aspirin when used for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Hudson Marie, Baron Murray, Rahme Elham, Pilote Louise

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;32(8):1589-93.

PMID:16078339
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients taking aspirin for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction are at increased risk of recurrent disease when they take concomitant ibuprofen.

METHODS

In this population based, retrospective cohort study using governmental databases, patients > or = 66 years of age, hospitalized for an index acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between January 1992 and March 1999 and taking ASA throughout the period of followup were identified. The main exposure was the concomitant use of ibuprofen and ASA after the index AMI. The outcome of interest was recurrent AMI. Subjects were followed to one year after the index AMI.

RESULTS

A total of 18,503 patients met the study entry criteria. Of these, 372 patients were dispensed a prescription for ibuprofen (exposed) and 14,424 patients were not dispensed a prescription for any nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) (unexposed). Patients dispensed prescriptions for any NSAID (n = 4079), naproxen (n = 1239), and diclofenac (n = 1474) were analyzed separately. There was a trend to an increase in the rate of recurrent AMI in patients taking ibuprofen and ASA compared to those taking ASA alone as the duration of exposure increased [hazard ratios for ever, > or = 30 days, and > or = 60 days exposed were 1.01 (95% CI 0.58-1.76), 1.13 (95% CI 0.54-2.39), and 1.83 (95% CI 0.76-4.42), respectively]. In contrast, subjects taking prolonged naproxen and ASA had a trend toward a lower rate of recurrent AMI compared to those taking ASA alone.

CONCLUSION

The results are consistent with data that suggest that regular, but not intermittent, ibuprofen may abrogate the benefits of aspirin when used for the secondary prevention of AMI. There may be differences in the risk of heart disease with various NSAID.

摘要

目的

确定心肌梗死二级预防中服用阿司匹林的患者同时服用布洛芬时,复发性疾病风险是否增加。

方法

在这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究中,使用政府数据库,确定年龄≥66岁、于1992年1月至1999年3月因首次急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院且在整个随访期间服用阿司匹林的患者。主要暴露因素是首次AMI后同时使用布洛芬和阿司匹林。感兴趣的结局是复发性AMI。对患者随访至首次AMI后一年。

结果

共有18503例患者符合研究纳入标准。其中,372例患者获得了布洛芬处方(暴露组),14424例患者未获得任何非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)处方(非暴露组)。对获得任何NSAID处方(n = 4079)、萘普生处方(n = 1239)和双氯芬酸处方(n = 1474)的患者分别进行分析。与仅服用阿司匹林的患者相比,服用布洛芬和阿司匹林的患者复发性AMI发生率有随暴露时间增加而上升的趋势[暴露时间为曾暴露、≥30天和≥60天的风险比分别为1.01(95%CI 0.58 - 1.76)、1.13(95%CI 0.54 - 2.39)和1.83(95%CI 0.76 - 4.42)]。相比之下,与仅服用阿司匹林的患者相比,长期服用萘普生和阿司匹林的患者复发性AMI发生率有下降趋势。

结论

结果与以下数据一致,即规律而非间歇性服用布洛芬可能会消除阿司匹林用于AMI二级预防的益处。不同NSAID的心脏病风险可能存在差异。

相似文献

1
Ibuprofen may abrogate the benefits of aspirin when used for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.布洛芬用于心肌梗死二级预防时可能会消除阿司匹林的益处。
J Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;32(8):1589-93.
2
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction in the general population.非甾体抗炎药与普通人群心肌梗死风险
Circulation. 2004 Jun 22;109(24):3000-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000132491.96623.04. Epub 2004 Jun 14.
3
Association between nonnaproxen NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors and hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction among the elderly: a retrospective cohort study.非萘普生非甾体抗炎药、COX-2抑制剂与老年人急性心肌梗死住院之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 May;16(5):493-503. doi: 10.1002/pds.1339.
4
Gastrointestinal complications of over-the-counter nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.非处方非甾体抗炎药的胃肠道并发症
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20(3):7-14.
5
Risks and benefits of COX-2 inhibitors vs non-selective NSAIDs: does their cardiovascular risk exceed their gastrointestinal benefit? A retrospective cohort study.COX-2抑制剂与非选择性非甾体抗炎药的风险与获益:其心血管风险是否超过胃肠道获益?一项回顾性队列研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Mar;46(3):435-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel428. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
6
Cardiovascular events associated with the use of four nonselective NSAIDs (etodolac, nabumetone, ibuprofen, or naproxen) versus a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (celecoxib): a population-based analysis in Taiwanese adults.与使用四种非选择性非甾体抗炎药(依托度酸、萘丁美酮、布洛芬或萘普生)相比,使用环氧化酶-2抑制剂(塞来昔布)相关的心血管事件:一项针对台湾成年人的基于人群的分析。
Clin Ther. 2006 Nov;28(11):1827-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.11.009.
7
The effects of nonselective non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications on the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction and their interaction with aspirin.非选择性非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药对非致命性心肌梗死风险的影响及其与阿司匹林的相互作用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 17;43(6):985-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.064.
8
Does the varied use of NSAIDs explain the differences in the risk of myocardial infarction?非甾体抗炎药的不同使用方式能否解释心肌梗死风险的差异?
J Intern Med. 2008 Nov;264(5):481-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01991.x. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
9
Duration of treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and impact on risk of death and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with prior myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study.非甾体抗炎药治疗持续时间与既往心肌梗死患者死亡和再发心肌梗死风险的关系:一项全国性队列研究。
Circulation. 2011 May 24;123(20):2226-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004671. Epub 2011 May 9.
10
Ask the doctor. I am a 60-year-old man with several risk factors for heart disease. I take Aleve twice a day. Do I still need to take aspirin, or is the Aleve enough? I often take ibuprofen for my headaches or aching back. Now my doctor wants me to start taking aspirin, and she suggested that I ease up on the ibuprofen. Why?咨询医生。我是一名60岁的男性,有多种心脏病风险因素。我每天服用两次萘普生。我还需要服用阿司匹林吗,还是萘普生就足够了?我经常服用布洛芬来缓解头痛或背痛。现在我的医生想让我开始服用阿司匹林,并且她建议我减少布洛芬的用量。为什么?
Harv Heart Lett. 2005 Feb;15(6):8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on Cardiovascular Disease Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis.抗风湿药物对类风湿关节炎患者心血管疾病事件的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 3;8:812631. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.812631. eCollection 2021.
2
Procedure-Related Access Site Pain Multimodal Management following Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention: A Randomized Control Trial.经皮心脏介入术后与操作相关的入路部位疼痛的多模式管理:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Jan 24;2022:6102793. doi: 10.1155/2022/6102793. eCollection 2022.
3
Practice Advisory on the Appropriate Use of NSAIDs in Primary Care.
基层医疗中合理使用非甾体抗炎药的实践指南
J Pain Res. 2020 Aug 3;13:1925-1939. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S247781. eCollection 2020.
4
Effect of evidence-based therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.基于证据的心血管疾病二级预防治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0210988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210988. eCollection 2019.
5
A narrative review of the cardiovascular risks associated with concomitant aspirin and NSAID use.一篇关于同时使用阿司匹林和 NSAID 相关心血管风险的叙述性综述。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Jan;47(1):16-30. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1764-5.
6
Efficacy of celecoxib versus ibuprofen for the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized double-blind, non-inferiority trial.塞来昔布与布洛芬治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效比较:一项随机双盲非劣效性试验。
J Int Med Res. 2017 Feb;45(1):59-74. doi: 10.1177/0300060516673707. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
Safe prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with osteoarthritis--an expert consensus addressing benefits as well as gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks.骨关节炎患者非甾体抗炎药的安全处方——兼顾获益以及胃肠道和心血管风险的专家共识
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 19;13:55. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0285-8.
8
PharmGKB summary: ibuprofen pathways.PharmGKB总结:布洛芬作用途径。
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2015 Feb;25(2):96-106. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000113.
9
Management of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evidence and expert opinion.类风湿关节炎患者心血管风险的管理:证据与专家意见。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2013 Aug;5(4):166-81. doi: 10.1177/1759720X13491025.
10
Drug interactions--principles, examples and clinical consequences.药物相互作用——原理、实例及临床后果。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Aug;109(33-34):546-55; quiz 556. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0546. Epub 2012 Aug 20.