Biskupiak Joseph E, Brixner Diana I, Howard Kimberly, Oderda Gary M
Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 208, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20(3):7-14.
This study assessed the "real-world" risk of serious gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, defined as perforations, ulcers and bleeds (PUBs) in a U.S. representative population that was using two commonly available over-the-counter (OTC) non-selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), naproxen or ibuprofen with or without concomitant aspirin usage. A retrospective review of a commercially available electronic medical record (EMR) database containing the ambulatory health record data for over 3.2 million individuals was conducted. Subjects were eligible for inclusion in the study if they received an OTC dosage of naproxen (220 mg) or ibuprofen (200 mg). An index date for each subject was defined as the first mention of an OTC NSAID in the medication list of the EMR dataset. Subjects were excluded from the analysis if they met any criteria, which can lead to GI bleeding complications. The dataset was analyzed for PUBs, as indicated by the ICD-9 diagnosis codes for gastric, duodenal, peptic, or gastrojejunal ulcers, or GI hemorrhage, as well as the concomitant use of aspirin. A pre/post-analysis was conducted using a case-crossover design with subjects as their own controls. The index date was the defining event, in order to determine the odds ratio associated with OTC NSAID usage. A pre-index time period of 365 days was used for prior PUBs. For the post-index time period, only PUBs that occurred within 90 days of the OTC NSAID index date were considered. The data set contained 11,957 subjects on naproxen and 38,507 subjects on ibuprofen. In both cases, OTC NSAID usage was associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds ratio for PUBs. Subjects on ibuprofen had an odds ratio of 1.38 (95% CI 1.07-1.78, P=0.01). Naproxen subjects exhibited an odds of 1.54 (95% CI 1.04-2.28, P=0.03). The concomitant aspirin population consisted of 2,328 naproxen subjects and 4,843 ibuprofen subjects. Concomitant aspirin usage was also associated with a significantly higher risk for PUBs than the corresponding monotherapy. Subjects taking both ibuprofen and aspirin had an odds ratio of 3.36 (2.36-4.80, P<.00001), while those on naproxen and aspirin had an odds ratio of 2.07 (1.23-3.49, P=.005) relative to those subjects on ibuprofen and naproxen monotherapy, respectively. Utilizing a national electronic medical record database representing patients seen predominantly in a primary care setting, this study has documented the "real-world" risk associated with the use of two common OTC NSAIDs, as well as the increased risk associated with concomitant aspirin use in this population.
本研究评估了在美国具有代表性的人群中,使用两种常见的非处方(OTC)非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)萘普生或布洛芬(无论是否同时使用阿司匹林)时,发生严重胃肠道(GI)毒性反应(定义为穿孔、溃疡和出血(PUBs))的“真实世界”风险。对一个包含超过320万个体门诊健康记录数据的商业可用电子病历(EMR)数据库进行了回顾性分析。如果受试者接受了OTC剂量的萘普生(220毫克)或布洛芬(200毫克),则有资格纳入本研究。每个受试者的索引日期定义为EMR数据集中药物列表中首次提及OTC NSAID的日期。如果受试者符合任何可能导致GI出血并发症的标准,则排除在分析之外。按照国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)中胃、十二指肠、消化性或胃肠空肠溃疡的诊断代码,或GI出血的诊断代码,以及阿司匹林的同时使用情况,对数据集进行PUBs分析。采用病例交叉设计,以受试者自身作为对照进行前后分析。索引日期为定义事件,以确定与OTC NSAID使用相关的优势比。使用365天的索引前时间段来确定之前的PUBs。对于索引后时间段,仅考虑在OTC NSAID索引日期后90天内发生的PUBs。数据集中有11,957名使用萘普生的受试者和38,507名使用布洛芬的受试者。在这两种情况下,OTC NSAID的使用与PUBs的优势比在统计学上均显著增加。使用布洛芬的受试者优势比为1.38(95%置信区间1.07 - 1.78,P = 0.01)。使用萘普生的受试者优势比为1.54(95%置信区间1.04 - 2.28,P = 0.03)。同时使用阿司匹林的人群包括2,328名使用萘普生的受试者和4,843名使用布洛芬的受试者。与相应的单一疗法相比,同时使用阿司匹林也与PUBs的显著更高风险相关。与仅使用布洛芬和萘普生单一疗法的受试者相比,同时服用布洛芬和阿司匹林的受试者优势比为3.36(2.36 - 4.80,P <.00001),而同时服用萘普生和阿司匹林的受试者优势比为2.07(1.23 - 3.49,P = 0.005)。本研究利用一个主要代表在初级保健机构就诊患者的全国电子病历数据库,记录了使用两种常见OTC NSAIDs的“真实世界”风险,以及该人群中同时使用阿司匹林所增加的风险。