Laflamme Mark R, Wilcox David C, Sullivan Jacquelyn, Schadow Gunther, Lindbergh Donald, Warvel Jill, Buchanan Heydon, Ising Terry, Abernathy Greg, Perkins Susan M, Daggy Joanne, Frankel Richard M, Dexter Paul, McDonald Clement J, Weiner Michael
Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Aug;53(8):1380-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53422.x.
To pilot and assess the role of videoconferencing in clinicians' medical decision-making and their interactions with nursing home residents (NHRs).
Paired virtual and bedside examinations. Face-to-face (FTF) examination of NHRs by off-site clinicians immediately followed videoconferencing between the same clinician-NHR pair.
A 240-bed, county-managed, urban nursing home.
NHRs (n=35) and clinicians (n=3) receiving or providing routine care between 2002 and 2003.
Orders generated by clinicians, clinicians' ratings of videoconferencing, and coded review of video encounters. After both examinations, clinicians rated the encounters and generated orders necessary for NHRs. Orders were categorized and counted according to timing (before or after the FTF visit). Clinician-NHR interactions were assessed using coding videos with a 31-item instrument.
For 71% of the encounters, clinicians stated that videoconferencing facilitated their assessment. Difficulties included sound quality (19%) and participants' familiarity with videoconferencing (7%). Although NHRs were alert in 50% of encounters, 62% of alert NHRs did not indicate understanding of the recommended treatment.
FTF examination was superior for most assessments, but videoconferencing was judged to be valuable, especially for wound care. Even when NHRs were alert, informed medical decision-making by NHRs with their clinicians was limited. Enhancing videoconferencing quality and providing more training about informed decision-making using videoconferencing might improve the effectiveness of the technology.
试行并评估视频会议在临床医生医疗决策以及他们与疗养院居民(NHRs)互动中的作用。
虚拟检查与床边检查配对。异地临床医生对NHRs进行面对面(FTF)检查,紧随其后的是同一临床医生 - NHRs对之间的视频会议。
一家拥有240张床位、由县管理的城市疗养院。
2002年至2003年期间接受或提供常规护理的NHRs(n = 35)和临床医生(n = 3)。
临床医生开出的医嘱、临床医生对视频会议的评分以及视频会诊的编码审查。两次检查后,临床医生对会诊进行评分并开出NHRs所需的医嘱。医嘱根据时间(FTF就诊之前或之后)进行分类和计数。使用包含31个项目的工具对临床医生 - NHRs互动进行编码视频评估。
在71%的会诊中,临床医生表示视频会议有助于他们的评估。困难包括音质(19%)和参与者对视频会议的熟悉程度(7%)。尽管在50%的会诊中NHRs意识清醒,但62%意识清醒的NHRs未表明理解推荐的治疗方法。
对于大多数评估而言,FTF检查更为优越,但视频会议被认为是有价值的,尤其是对于伤口护理。即使NHRs意识清醒,他们与临床医生之间的知情医疗决策也很有限。提高视频会议质量并提供更多关于使用视频会议进行知情决策的培训可能会提高该技术的有效性。