van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Singh A, Tornero J, Melo-Gomes J, Codreanu C, Pedersen R, Freundlich B, Fatenejad S
Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Mar;65(3):328-34. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.035709. Epub 2005 Aug 3.
To compare patient reported measures of function, health related quality of life (QoL), and satisfaction with medication among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with methotrexate (MTX), etanercept, or both for up to 1 year.
In a 52 week, double blind, clinical trial, patients with active RA were randomised to receive etanercept 25 mg twice weekly, methotrexate up to 20 mg weekly, or combination therapy. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index, EuroQoL health status visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS), patient global assessment, and patient general health VAS were administered at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52. Satisfaction with the medication was compared at 52 weeks.
Of 682 enrolled patients, 522 completed 52 weeks of treatment. Mean improvement from baseline in HAQ score was 0.65, 0.70, and 1.0 for MTX, etanercept, and the combination, respectively. The mean percentage and absolute improvement in the HAQ was significantly higher (p<0.01) for combination therapy than for either of the monotherapies. Combination therapy produced significantly more rapid achievement of HAQ < or =0.5 sustained for 6 months than either of the monotherapies (p<0.01). Compared with patients receiving monotherapy, those receiving combination therapy achieved a significantly better (p<0.05) health state as measured by the EQ-5D VAS (mean (SD) 63.7 (3.2), 66.8 (3.2), 72.7 (3.1) for MTX, etanercept, and the combination, respectively). Results were similar for other assessments (p<0.01). Patients in combination and etanercept groups were significantly more likely (p<0.0001, p = 0.0009, respectively) to report satisfaction with the medication.
Combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate improved function, QoL, and satisfaction with the medication significantly more than monotherapy.
比较接受甲氨蝶呤(MTX)、依那西普或两者联合治疗长达1年的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者报告的功能指标、健康相关生活质量(QoL)以及药物满意度。
在一项为期52周的双盲临床试验中,将活动性RA患者随机分为三组,分别接受每周两次25mg依那西普、每周最多20mg甲氨蝶呤或联合治疗。在基线以及第2、4、8、12、16、20、24、32、40、48和52周时,使用健康评估问卷(HAQ)残疾指数、欧洲五维健康量表视觉模拟评分(EQ-5D VAS)、患者整体评估和患者总体健康视觉模拟评分进行评估。在第52周时比较药物满意度。
682名入组患者中,522名完成了52周的治疗。MTX、依那西普和联合治疗组的HAQ评分从基线的平均改善分别为0.65、0.70和1.0。联合治疗组HAQ的平均百分比和绝对改善显著高于(p<0.01)单一疗法中的任何一种。联合治疗比单一疗法更快地使HAQ≤0.5并持续6个月(p<0.01)。与接受单一疗法的患者相比,接受联合治疗的患者在EQ-5D VAS评估中达到了显著更好(p<0.05)的健康状态(MTX、依那西普和联合治疗组的均值(标准差)分别为63.7(3.2)、66.8(3.2)、72.7(3.1))。其他评估结果相似(p<0.01)。联合治疗组和依那西普组的患者报告对药物满意的可能性显著更高(分别为p<0.0001和p = 0.0009)。
依那西普和甲氨蝶呤联合治疗在改善功能、生活质量和药物满意度方面显著优于单一疗法。