• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗复杂旁路移植血管病变:来自SECURE注册研究的见解

Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of complex bypass graft disease: insights from the SECURE registry.

作者信息

Costa Marco, Angiolillo Dominick J, Teirstein Paul, Gilmore Paul, Leon Martin, Moses Jeffrey, Yakubov Steven, Carter Andrew, Fischell Tim, Zenni Martin, Bass Theodore

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Florida, Shands, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Aug;17(8):396-8.

PMID:16079441
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Graft disease remains a therapeutic challenge. Procedural complications and unsatisfactory patency rates are realized with both percutaneous intervention and repeat coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease has been established, but the use of this technology to treat bypass graft disease remains undefined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SES to treat patients with high-risk bypass graft disease.

METHODS

The compassionate use of SES (SECURE) study included patients with recurrent coronary disease and no acceptable alternative available treatment, including brachytherapy or CABG. Outcomes from 76 patients (n = 94 lesions) with graft lesions treated with SES in the U.S. were compared with the outcomes of 176 patients (n = 311 lesions) with only native vessels. IVUS follow-up was performed at 8 months in 14 patients with graft SES treatment.

RESULTS

In-hospital outcomes were similar between both groups, with 99% of patients discharged without adverse events. The incidence of target vessel failure including death, MI, and TVR at 12 months in the bypass graft group (55.3%) was similar to that observed in the native vessel group (45.5%, p = 0.17). Intimal hyperplasia (IH) measured by IVUS was 11.8 +/- 16.5%; 50% of patients with graft SES had < 1% IH at 8 months.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of SES in high-risk patients with recurrent bypass graft disease is feasible. SES represents a future.

摘要

未标注

移植物疾病仍然是一个治疗挑战。经皮介入治疗和再次冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术都存在手术并发症和不理想的通畅率。西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)治疗新发冠状动脉疾病的疗效已得到证实,但该技术用于治疗旁路移植血管疾病的情况仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估SES治疗高危旁路移植血管疾病患者的安全性和可行性。

方法

SES的同情使用(SECURE)研究纳入了患有复发性冠心病且没有可接受的替代治疗方法(包括近距离放射治疗或CABG)的患者。将美国76例(94处病变)接受SES治疗的移植血管病变患者的结果与176例(311处病变)仅患有自身血管病变的患者的结果进行比较。对14例接受移植血管SES治疗的患者在8个月时进行血管内超声(IVUS)随访。

结果

两组的住院结局相似,99%的患者出院时无不良事件。旁路移植血管组12个月时包括死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管再次干预(TVR)的靶血管失败发生率(55.3%)与自身血管组观察到的发生率(45.5%,p = 0.17)相似。通过IVUS测量的内膜增生(IH)为11.8±16.5%;50%接受移植血管SES治疗的患者在8个月时IH<1%。

结论

在高危复发性旁路移植血管疾病患者中植入SES是可行的。SES代表着一个未来。

相似文献

1
Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of complex bypass graft disease: insights from the SECURE registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗复杂旁路移植血管病变:来自SECURE注册研究的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Aug;17(8):396-8.
2
Prospective native coronary artery stenosis treated with sirolimus-eluting stent (ONASSIS) registry--acute results and mid-term outcomes: a single-center experience.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Aug;17(8):401-5.
3
Treatment of sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis: additional stent, balloon angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass graft.西罗莫司洗脱支架再狭窄的治疗:置入额外支架、球囊血管成形术及冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Card Surg. 2013 Mar;28(2):97-101. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12056. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
4
3-year follow-up of the SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架与血管内近距离放射治疗治疗支架内再狭窄(SISR)试验的3年随访
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.010.
5
Increased late mortality after sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in diseased saphenous vein grafts: results from the randomized DELAYED RRISC Trial.在病变大隐静脉移植物中,西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架相比晚期死亡率增加:随机DELAYED RRISC试验的结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 17;50(3):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.010. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
6
Predictive factors of cardiac events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗支架内再狭窄后心脏事件的预测因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2006 May 10;109(2):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
7
Everolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. The PRECOMBAT-2 (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) study.依维莫司洗脱支架植入术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄。PRECOMBAT-2(左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中使用依维莫司洗脱支架的旁路手术与血管成形术的随机比较的初步结果)研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul;5(7):708-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.002.
8
Effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with a prior history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery.西罗莫司洗脱支架在治疗既往有冠状动脉旁路移植手术史患者中的有效性。
Coron Artery Dis. 2004 May;15(3):171-5. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200405000-00006.
9
Outcome in the real-world of coronary high-risk intervention with drug-eluting stents (ORCHID) -- a single-center study comparing Cypher sirolimus-eluting with Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架用于冠状动脉高危干预的真实世界结果(ORCHID)——一项比较西罗莫司洗脱Cypher支架与紫杉醇洗脱Taxus支架的单中心研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):663-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20741.
10
Post-sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis treated with repeat percutaneous intervention: late angiographic and clinical outcomes.
Circulation. 2004 Jun 1;109(21):2500-2. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130173.63105.4E. Epub 2004 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Modern Approach to a Classic Challenge.药物洗脱支架再狭窄:经典挑战的现代应对策略。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(3):e030123212355. doi: 10.2174/1573403X19666230103154638.