Bouma G J, Muizelaar J P, Bandoh K, Marmarou A
Division of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
J Neurosurg. 1992 Jul;77(1):15-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1992.77.1.0015.
Increased brain tissue stiffness following severe traumatic brain injury is an important factor in the development of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). However, the mechanisms involved in brain tissue stiffness are not well understood, particularly the effect of changes in systemic blood pressure. Thus, controversy exists as to the optimum management of blood pressure in severe head injury, and diverging treatment strategies have been proposed. In the present study, the effect of induced alterations in blood pressure on ICP and brain stiffness as indicated by the pressure-volume index (PVI) was studied during 58 tests of autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in 47 comatose head-injured patients. In patients with intact autoregulation mechanisms, lowering the blood pressure caused a steep increase in ICP (from 20 +/- 3 to 30 +/- 2 mm Hg, mean +/- standard error of the mean), while raising blood pressure did not change the ICP. When autoregulation was defective, ICP varied directly with blood pressure. Accordingly, with intact autoregulation, a weak positive correlation between PVI and cerebral perfusion pressure was found; however, with defective autoregulation, the PVI was inversely related to cerebral perfusion pressure. The various blood pressure manipulations did not significantly alter the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen, irrespective of the status of autoregulation. It is concluded that the changes in ICP can be explained by changes in cerebral blood volume due to cerebral vasoconstriction or dilatation, while the changes in PVI can be largely attributed to alterations in transmural pressure, which may or may not be attenuated by cerebral arteriolar vasoconstriction, depending on the autoregulatory status. The data indicate that a decline in blood pressure should be avoided in head-injured patients, even when baseline blood pressure is high. On the other hand, induced hypertension did not consistently reduce ICP in patients with intact autoregulation and should only be attempted after thorough assessment of the cerebrovascular status and under careful monitoring of its effects.
严重创伤性脑损伤后脑组织硬度增加是颅内压(ICP)升高发展过程中的一个重要因素。然而,脑组织硬度增加所涉及的机制尚未完全明确,尤其是全身血压变化的影响。因此,对于重型颅脑损伤患者血压的最佳管理存在争议,并且已经提出了不同的治疗策略。在本研究中,在对47例昏迷颅脑损伤患者进行的58次脑血流自动调节测试中,研究了血压诱导变化对ICP和由压力 - 容积指数(PVI)表示的脑硬度的影响。在自动调节机制完整的患者中,降低血压会导致ICP急剧升高(从20±3毫米汞柱升至30±2毫米汞柱,平均值±平均标准误差),而升高血压则不会改变ICP。当自动调节功能受损时,ICP与血压直接相关。因此,在自动调节功能完整时,发现PVI与脑灌注压之间存在弱正相关;然而,当自动调节功能受损时,PVI与脑灌注压呈负相关。无论自动调节状态如何,各种血压操作均未显著改变脑氧代谢率。研究得出结论,ICP的变化可由脑血管收缩或扩张引起的脑血容量变化来解释,而PVI的变化很大程度上可归因于跨壁压力的改变,这可能会或可能不会因脑小动脉血管收缩而减弱,这取决于自动调节状态。数据表明,即使基线血压较高,颅脑损伤患者也应避免血压下降。另一方面,在自动调节功能完整的患者中,诱导性高血压并不能持续降低ICP,并且仅应在对脑血管状态进行全面评估并仔细监测其效果后尝试。