Gleeson Michael
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005 Sep;8(5):511-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000170760.63490.95.
To discuss the advantages and limitations of the methods currently available to assess changes in human immune function in response to interventions such as changes in diet or exercise.
Much recent research has focused on the effect of regular moderate exercise and the role of foods or specific food components in enhancing immune system responsiveness to challenge and thereby improving health and reducing disease risk. The present review summarizes the issues in experimental design that need to be considered in human intervention studies, the immune function variables commonly used as markers in such studies and the biological relevance (e.g. known correlation with clinically relevant endpoints) of the markers. In-vivo markers appear to be the best. Markers of peripheral blood leukocyte function are also of value since they may provide information on the mechanism(s) of change caused by an intervention.
Currently, no single marker of human immune function is available to predict the outcome of an exercise or dietary intervention on the resistance to infection or to other immune system-related diseases. There is too little evidence at present that correlates individual markers with global health improvement and therefore assessing changes of immune function requires a thorough methodological approach targeting a large spectrum of parameters.
探讨目前用于评估人类免疫功能因饮食或运动等干预措施而发生变化的现有方法的优缺点。
近期许多研究聚焦于规律适度运动的效果,以及食物或特定食物成分在增强免疫系统对挑战的反应能力、从而改善健康状况和降低疾病风险方面的作用。本综述总结了人体干预研究中实验设计需要考虑的问题、此类研究中常用作标志物的免疫功能变量,以及这些标志物的生物学相关性(如与临床相关终点的已知关联)。体内标志物似乎是最佳选择。外周血白细胞功能标志物也有价值,因为它们可能提供有关干预措施引起变化的机制的信息。
目前,尚无单一的人类免疫功能标志物可预测运动或饮食干预对感染抵抗力或其他免疫系统相关疾病的影响。目前几乎没有证据表明个体标志物与整体健康改善相关,因此评估免疫功能变化需要针对广泛参数的全面方法。