Spencer Lisa, Rollo Megan, Hauck Yvonne, MacDonald-Wicks Lesley, Wood Lisa, Hutchesson Melinda, Giglia Roslyn, Smith Roger, Collins Clare
1 School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition. The University of Newcastle, New South Wales2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia3 School of Biomedical Science and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales4 School of Public Health, Western Australian Centre for Health Promotion Research, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia5 School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales.6 The Western Australian Group for Evidence Informed Healthcare Practice: an Affiliate centre of The Joanna Briggs Institute7 University of Newcastle Evidence Based Health Care Group: a JBI Evidence Synthesis Group.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: What are the effects of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women?The primary objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of weight management interventions which include a diet component and are aimed at limiting gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention in women.The second objective of this systematic review is to investigate included intervention components with respect to effect on weight-related outcomes. This may include, but is not limited to: length of intervention, use of face-to-face counselling, group or individual consultations, use of other interventions components including exercise, use of goals and use of support tools like food diaries, coaching, including email or text message support.
Around half of all women of reproductive age are either overweight or obese, with women aged 25-34 years having a greater risk of substantial weight gain compared with men of all ages. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight retention (PPWR) may play a significant role in long term obesity. Having one child doubles the five- and 10-year obesity incidence for women, with many women who gain excessive weight during pregnancy remaining obese permanently. Excessive GWG and/or PPWR can also significantly contribute to short- and long-term adverse health outcomes for mother, baby and future pregnancies.Maternal obesity increases the risk of pregnancy related complications such as pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, stillbirth and the rate of caesarean section. Childhood obesity is a further long term complication of maternal obesity for offspring, which may persist in to adulthood. Excess GWG is also a risk factor for PPWR both in the short and long-term. Nehring et al. conducted a meta-analysis with over 65,000 women showing that, compared to women who gained weight within recommendations during pregnancy, women with GWG above Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations, retained an additional 3.1 kg and 4.7kg after three and greater than or equal to 15 years postpartum, respectively. The health risk associated with PPWR is highlighted in a study of 151,025 Swedish women followed between 1992 and 2001.The study identified the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for those who gained three or more units of Body Mass Index (kg/m2) between consecutive pregnancies (an average of two years) was much higher compared with women whose BMI changed from -1.0 and 0.9 units. Long-term chronic disease risk may also be affected by PPWR as weight retention at the end of the first year post-partum has been found to be a predictor of maternal overweight 15 years later.With around 14-20% of women retaining 5kg or more 12 months postpartum, the risk of developing conditions like diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease may be increased. It becomes evident that interventions which aim to support attainment of healthy weight both in the antenatal and postpartum periods are key health priorities for women during this life stage.Lifestyle factors of overweight, having poor diet quality, and not undertaking enough moderate-to-vigorous physical activity are amongst the top five predictors of mortality in women. Additionally it is noted that, for many women, pregnancy and the postpartum period are associated with a reduction in physical activity. It is known that a combination of poor dietary choices, an increase in sedentary time and reduction in physical activity are all contributors to the development of overweight and obesity. With this in mind, current research has focused on lifestyle interventions to limit GWG and PPWR. Thangaratinam et al. reviewed 44 randomized controlled trials (7278 women) where interventions including diet, physical activity or both were evaluated for their influence on maternal weight during pregnancy. Results indicate that all were significantly effective in reducing GWG compared with the control group. More specifically, dietary interventions were the most effective in reducing weight gain, with a mean weight loss of -3.84kg compared with -0.72kg and -1.06kg for physical activity and the mixed (diet plus physical activity) approach, respectively. This finding is supported by Hill and colleagues' recent systematic review of theory based interventions to limit GWG. Included studies in this review reported an underpinning theory base and were classified as adopting a dietary, physical activity or mixed approach. Hill et al. concluded that studies which included a diet intervention were significantly more effective at limiting GWG.In 2011 Tanentsapf et al. reviewed the effect of dietary interventions alone for reducing GWG in normal weight, overweight and obese pregnant women. This review analysed 13 randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials with a dietary intervention to prevent excessive GWG in women. The review concluded that dietary interventions during pregnancy were effective in reducing GWG with an effect of -1.92kg (n=1434) compared with the control group.Tanentsapf et al. identified that trials differed in the conduct of the interventions with various diet and non-diet related components utilised. Dietary approaches were highly variable with some trials focusing only on calorie restriction and others included additional target macronutrient distribution for intake. Some trials further provided feedback based on maternal weight gain guidelines. Interventions also varied in delivery method with a variety of modes used, including face-to-face, individual or group consultations and/or written correspondence. The frequency of communication, despite the type or mix, also changed from trial to trial with additional methods via telephone, posted materials, feedback or food diaries utilised. The inclusion of physical activity in addition to diet intervention was also common. Whilst the recent review by Tanentsapf et al. identified that dietary interventions are effective in reducing GWG, the review did not investigate the impact that different intervention components, delivery methods or dietary counselling approaches had on gestational weight management. It remains unclear as to which intervention components optimize GWG in women.The impact of lifestyle interventions has also been investigated in the postpartum period. The recent systematic review from van der Pligt et al. reported seven of 11 studies reviewed were successful in limiting PPWR. As with studies aimed at limiting GWG, interventions included in van der Pligt et al.'s review differed greatly in their conduct. Six of these seven studies included both dietary and physical activity components for the intervention, with the final successful study including a diet only intervention. Five of the successful studies recruited overweight or obese women only. Intervention time varied considerably in successful studies with some running for as little at ten days, and others up to six months.Bertz et al. demonstrated that their 12-week behavior modification intervention which targeted diet alone or diet and exercise, including two individual sessions with a dietitian and physical therapist, provision of scales for weight self-monitoring and bi-weekly text messages was successful in achieving significant weight loss following the intervention, and sustained at one year. The diet intervention and the diet and exercise intervention yielded significant weight loss compared to the control. Following 12 weeks a reduction of -8.3 +/- 4.2kg for diet intervention and -6.9 +/- 3.0kg for diet and exercise was observed. Additionally after one year, the diet intervention showed -10.2 +/- 5.7kg reduction and -7.3 +/- 6.3kg for the diet and exercise intervention (p<0.001). Colleran et al. also found significant weight change results by implementing a 16-week intervention which consisted of weekly individual sessions with a dietitian regarding calorie restriction, two additional home visits regarding exercise, weekly food diary completion and email support. The intervention group had greater weight loss compared to the control group (-5.8kg +/- 3.5kg vs -1.6kg +/- 5.4kg). It can be seen that various methods have been utilized in investigating the impact of diet and physical activity interventions on PPWR. The review by van der Pligt et al. highlights the impact successful lifestyle interventions can have on postpartum weight change. However, this review did not investigate the different intervention strategies utilized. It remains unclear as to the optimal setting, delivery method, diet strategy, contact frequency or intervention length to limit PPWR.Previous systematic reviews for both GWG and PPWR have focused on the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions as a whole for weight management in pregnant and postpartum women. And despite Tanentsapf et al.'s focus on dietary interventions for GWG, much is still unknown about the effectiveness of differing diet interventions over the antenatal and postpartum period. Specifically, the impact of differing diet intervention strategies on maternal weight gain is not known. Firstly, this systematic review will focus on whether weight management interventions which include a dietary component are effective in pregnant and postpartum women. In addition to this, this review will investigate the different intervention strategies utilized and their effectiveness in maternal weight management. A search of systematic review protocol databases has shown that there is no current review underway for this topic.
综述问题/目标:包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局有何影响?
本系统综述的主要目标是评估包含饮食成分且旨在限制女性孕期体重增加和产后体重滞留的体重管理干预措施的有效性。
本系统综述的第二个目标是研究纳入的干预措施组成部分对体重相关结局的影响。这可能包括但不限于:干预时长、面对面咨询的使用、小组或个体咨询、其他干预措施组成部分(如运动)的使用、目标的设定以及食物日记、辅导(包括电子邮件或短信支持)等支持工具的使用。
约一半的育龄女性超重或肥胖,25 - 34岁的女性比各年龄段男性体重显著增加的风险更高。孕期体重过度增加(GWG)和产后体重滞留(PPWR)可能在长期肥胖中起重要作用。生育一个孩子会使女性患肥胖症的5年和10年发病率翻倍,许多孕期体重过度增加的女性会一直肥胖。过度的GWG和/或PPWR也会显著导致母婴及未来妊娠的短期和长期不良健康结局。
孕妇肥胖会增加与妊娠相关并发症的风险,如先兆子痫、妊娠期糖尿病、死产和剖宫产率。儿童肥胖是孕妇肥胖对后代的另一个长期并发症,可能持续到成年。短期和长期来看,过量的GWG也是PPWR的一个风险因素。内林等人对超过65000名女性进行了一项荟萃分析,结果表明,与孕期体重增加在推荐范围内的女性相比,孕期体重增加超过医学研究所体重增加建议的女性,产后3年及产后15年及以上分别额外多保留3.1千克和4.7千克体重。一项对151025名瑞典女性在1992年至2001年期间进行跟踪的研究突出了与PPWR相关的健康风险。该研究发现,与BMI变化在 - 1.0至0.9单位之间的女性相比,在连续妊娠(平均两年)期间体重指数增加3个或更多单位(kg/m²)的女性发生不良妊娠结局的风险要高得多。产后第一年结束时的体重滞留也可能影响长期慢性病风险,因为它已被发现是15年后母亲超重的一个预测因素。约14 - 20%的女性在产后12个月体重滞留5千克或更多,患糖尿病、代谢综合征和心血管疾病等疾病的风险可能会增加。显然,旨在支持孕妇和产后女性在产前和产后达到健康体重的干预措施是这一生命阶段女性的关键健康优先事项。
超重、饮食质量差和缺乏足够的中等到剧烈身体活动等生活方式因素是女性死亡率的五大预测因素之一。此外,值得注意的是,对许多女性来说,怀孕和产后时期身体活动会减少。众所周知,不良的饮食选择、久坐时间增加和身体活动减少共同导致超重和肥胖的发生。考虑到这一点,目前的研究集中在生活方式干预以限制GWG和PPWR。坦加拉蒂南等人回顾了44项随机对照试验(7278名女性),其中对包括饮食、身体活动或两者的干预措施对孕期母亲体重的影响进行了评估。结果表明,与对照组相比,所有这些干预措施在减少GWG方面都显著有效。更具体地说,饮食干预在减轻体重增加方面最有效,平均体重减轻 - 3.84千克,而身体活动和混合(饮食加身体活动)方法分别为 - 0.72千克和 - 1.06千克。这一发现得到了希尔及其同事最近对基于理论的限制GWG干预措施的系统综述的支持。该综述纳入的研究报告了一个基础理论基础,并被分类为采用饮食、身体活动或混合方法。希尔等人得出结论,包括饮食干预的研究在限制GWG方面显著更有效。
2011年,塔嫩察普夫等人回顾了单纯饮食干预对正常体重、超重和肥胖孕妇减少GWG的影响。该综述分析了13项随机对照试验和半随机对照试验,这些试验采用饮食干预以防止女性过度GWG。综述得出结论,孕期饮食干预在减少GWG方面是有效的,与对照组相比,效果为 - 1.92千克(n = 1434)。
塔嫩察普夫等人发现,试验在干预实施方面存在差异,使用了各种饮食和非饮食相关成分。饮食方法高度可变,一些试验仅关注热量限制,而其他试验还包括额外的目标宏量营养素摄入分配。一些试验还根据孕妇体重增加指南提供反馈。干预的实施方式也各不相同,使用了多种模式,包括面对面、个体或小组咨询和/或书面通信。沟通频率也因试验而异,尽管类型或组合不同,还使用了通过电话、邮寄材料、反馈或食物日记等额外方法。除饮食干预外还纳入身体活动也很常见。虽然塔嫩察普夫等人最近的综述确定饮食干预在减少GWG方面是有效的,但该综述并未调查不同的干预措施组成部分、实施方式或饮食咨询方法对孕期体重管理的影响。目前尚不清楚哪些干预措施组成部分能优化女性的GWG。
生活方式干预在产后时期的影响也已得到研究。范德普利特等人最近进行的系统综述报告称,在其回顾的11项研究中有7项成功限制了PPWR。与旨在限制GWG的研究一样,范德普利特等人综述中纳入的干预措施在实施方面差异很大。这7项成功研究中有6项干预措施同时包括饮食和身体活动成分,最后一项成功研究仅包括饮食干预。5项成功研究仅招募了超重或肥胖女性。成功研究中的干预时间差异很大,有些仅持续十天,而其他的长达六个月。
贝尔茨等人证明,他们为期12周的行为改变干预措施,单独针对饮食或饮食与运动,包括与营养师和物理治疗师进行两次个体咨询、提供体重自我监测秤以及每两周发送一次短信,在干预后成功实现了显著的体重减轻,并在一年后保持稳定。与对照组相比,饮食干预和饮食与运动干预均实现了显著的体重减轻。12周后,饮食干预组体重减轻 - 8.3±4.2千克,饮食与运动干预组体重减轻 - 6.9±3.0千克。此外,一年后,饮食干预组体重减轻 - 10.2±5.7千克,饮食与运动干预组体重减轻 - 7.3±6.3千克(p < 0.001)。科勒兰等人通过实施一项为期16周的干预措施也发现了显著的体重变化结果,该干预措施包括每周与营养师进行一次关于热量限制的个体咨询、另外两次关于运动的家访、每周完成食物日记以及电子邮件支持。与对照组相比,干预组体重减轻更多( - 5.8千克±3.5千克对 - 1.6千克±5.4千克)。可以看出,在研究饮食和身体活动干预对PPWR的影响时使用了各种方法。范德普利特等人的综述突出了成功的生活方式干预对产后体重变化的影响。然而,该综述并未调查所采用的不同干预策略。目前尚不清楚限制PPWR的最佳环境、实施方式、饮食策略、接触频率或干预时长。
之前针对GWG和PPWR的系统综述都集中在生活方式干预对孕妇和产后女性体重管理的整体有效性上。尽管塔嫩察普夫等人关注饮食干预对GWG的影响,但对于产前和产后不同饮食干预的有效性仍知之甚少。具体而言,不同饮食干预策略对孕妇体重增加的影响尚不清楚。首先,本系统综述将关注包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性是否有效。除此之外,本综述还将调查所采用的不同干预策略及其在孕妇体重管理中的有效性。对系统综述协议数据库的搜索表明,目前尚无针对该主题的综述正在进行。