• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替加环素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效和安全性:汇总临床试验数据分析

The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: analysis of pooled clinical trial data.

作者信息

Babinchak Timothy, Ellis-Grosse Evelyn, Dartois Nathalie, Rose Gilbert M, Loh Evan

机构信息

Medical Research Group, Wyeth Research, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;41 Suppl 5:S354-67. doi: 10.1086/431676.

DOI:10.1086/431676
PMID:16080073
Abstract

This pooled analysis includes 2 phase 3, double-blind trials designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tigecycline, versus that of imipenem-cilastatin, in 1642 adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Patients were randomized to receive either tigecycline (initial dose of 100 mg, followed by 50 mg intravenously every 12 h) or imipenem-cilastatin (500/500 mg intravenously every 6 h) for 5-14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-42 days after therapy) in the co-primary end point microbiologically evaluable and microbiological modified intent-to-treat populations. For the microbiologically evaluable group, clinical cure rates were 86.1% (441/512) for tigecycline, versus 86.2% (442/513) for imipenem-cilastatin (95% confidence interval for the difference, -4.5% to 4.4%; P < .0001 for noninferiority). Clinical cure rates in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population were 80.2% (506/631) for tigecycline, versus 81.5% (514/631) for imipenem-cilastatin (95% confidence interval for the difference, -5.8% to 3.2%; P < .0001 for noninferiority). Nausea (24.4% tigecycline, 19.0% imipenem-cilastatin [P = .01]), vomiting (19.2% tigecycline, 14.3% imipenem-cilastatin [P = .008]), and diarrhea (13.8% tigecycline, 13.2% imipenem-cilastatin [P = .719]) were the most frequently reported adverse events. This pooled analysis demonstrates that tigecycline was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

摘要

这项汇总分析纳入了2项3期双盲试验,旨在评估替加环素与亚胺培南-西司他丁相比,在1642例患有复杂性腹腔内感染的成人患者中的安全性和疗效。患者被随机分配接受替加环素(初始剂量100mg,随后每12小时静脉注射50mg)或亚胺培南-西司他丁(每6小时静脉注射500/500mg)治疗5至14天。主要终点是在共同主要终点的微生物学可评估和微生物学改良意向性治疗人群中,治疗结束访视(治疗后12 - 42天)时的临床反应。对于微生物学可评估组,替加环素的临床治愈率为86.1%(441/512),亚胺培南-西司他丁为86.2%(442/513)(差异的95%置信区间为-4.5%至4.4%;非劣效性检验P<0.0001)。微生物学改良意向性治疗人群中,替加环素的临床治愈率为80.2%(506/631),亚胺培南-西司他丁为81.5%(514/631)(差异的95%置信区间为-5.8%至3.2%;非劣效性检验P<0.0001)。恶心(替加环素24.4%,亚胺培南-西司他丁19.0%[P = 0.01])、呕吐(替加环素19.2%,亚胺培南-西司他丁14.3%[P = 0.008])和腹泻(替加环素13.8%,亚胺培南-西司他丁13.2%[P = 0.719])是最常报告的不良事件。这项汇总分析表明,替加环素在治疗复杂性腹腔内感染患者中有效且耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: analysis of pooled clinical trial data.替加环素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效和安全性:汇总临床试验数据分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;41 Suppl 5:S354-67. doi: 10.1086/431676.
2
The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections - the European experience.替加环素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效与安全性——欧洲经验
J Chemother. 2008 Oct;20 Suppl 1:12-9. doi: 10.1179/joc.2008.20.Supplement-1.12.
3
Comparison of tigecycline with imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.比较替加环素与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗医院获得性肺炎。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;68(2):140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.05.012.
4
A multicenter trial of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline versus imipenem/cilastatin in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections [Study ID Numbers: 3074A1-301-WW; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00081744].一项多中心试验:比较替加环素与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染患者的疗效和安全性[研究编号:3074A1-301-WW;美国国立医学图书馆临床试验标识符:NCT00081744]
BMC Infect Dis. 2005 Oct 19;5:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-88.
5
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial.替加环素单药治疗与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗中国复杂性腹腔内感染患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 21;10:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-217.
6
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial.替加环素单药治疗与万古霉素联合氨曲南治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项3期随机双盲试验的结果
Int J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep;9(5):251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.003.
7
The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam.替加环素治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效与安全性:两项与万古霉素-氨曲南对比的双盲3期研究结果
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;41 Suppl 5:S341-53. doi: 10.1086/431675.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of IV doripenem versus meropenem in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection: a phase III, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study.静脉注射多黏菌素B与美罗培南治疗成人复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效和耐受性:一项III期、前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):868-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.04.019.
9
A Phase 3, open-label, non-comparative study of tigecycline in the treatment of patients with selected serious infections due to resistant Gram-negative organisms including Enterobacter species, Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae.一项关于替加环素治疗由耐药革兰氏阴性菌(包括肠杆菌属、鲍曼不动杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌)引起的特定严重感染患者的3期开放标签、非对照研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Sep;62 Suppl 1:i29-40. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn249.
10
Tigecycline is efficacious in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections.替加环素在治疗复杂性腹腔内感染方面有效。
Int J Surg. 2005;3(1):35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.03.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction and analysis of toxic and side effects of tigecycline based on deep learning.基于深度学习的替加环素毒副作用预测与分析
Front Microbiol. 2024 Dec 17;15:1512091. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1512091. eCollection 2024.
2
Omadacycline for Diverse Infections in China: A Real-World Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.奥马环素在中国治疗多种感染的疗效与安全性的真实世界分析
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Dec;13(12):2509-2526. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01065-3. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Third-Generation Tetracyclines: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Potential.
第三代四环素类药物:现有知识和治疗潜力。
Biomolecules. 2024 Jun 30;14(7):783. doi: 10.3390/biom14070783.
4
Characterization of ST15-KL112 Co-Harboring and in China.在中国共携带ST15-KL112的特征分析。
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Jul 2;17:2719-2732. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S462158. eCollection 2024.
5
Promiscuous, persistent and problematic: insights into current enterococcal genomics to guide therapeutic strategy.混杂、持续且棘手:深入了解当前肠球菌基因组学,以指导治疗策略。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03243-2.
6
Clinical use of tigecycline may contribute to the widespread dissemination of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent strains.替加环素的临床应用可能导致碳青霉烯类耐药高毒力菌株的广泛传播。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024 Dec;13(1):2306957. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2306957. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
7
Clinical Manifestations and Risk Factors of Tigecycline-Associated Thrombocytopenia.替加环素相关血小板减少症的临床表现及危险因素
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Sep 15;16:6225-6235. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S426259. eCollection 2023.
8
Recent Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Anaerobic Clinical Isolates.厌氧临床分离株中抗菌药物耐药性的最新趋势
Microorganisms. 2023 Jun 1;11(6):1474. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061474.
9
Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: A Continuing Challenge.感染性心内膜炎的治疗:一项持续的挑战。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Apr 4;12(4):704. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040704.
10
Evaluation of Tigecycline Utilization and Trends in Antibacterial Resistance from 2018 to 2021 in a Comprehensive Teaching Hospital in China.中国一家综合性教学医院2018年至2021年替加环素使用情况及抗菌药物耐药性趋势评估
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Feb 14;16:879-889. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S395158. eCollection 2023.