Loehberg C R, Lux M P, Ackermann S, Poehls U G, Bani M R, Schulz-Wendtland R, Papadopoulos T, Schmucker M, Beckmann M W, Fasching P A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Erlangen, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Anticancer Res. 2005 May-Jun;25(3c):2519-25.
To improve breast cancer treatment, the evaluation of predictive factors is in the focus of clinical research. Significant discrepancies between the clinical assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the pathological assessment of response from post-therapy surgical specimens have been demonstrated. We focused on comparing the value of various diagnostic methods used in medical routine.
A clinical evaluation of the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes before and after NACT was performed in 139 patients by physical examination, sonography and mammography.
Mammography and physical examination correlated best with pathological findings in the measurement of the tumour, whereas sonography was the most accurate predictor of the status for axillary lymph nodes.
Mammography and physical examination are the best non-invasive predictors of the real size of the primary breast cancer, whereas sonography correlates better with the proven status of axillary lymph nodes.
为改善乳腺癌治疗效果,预测因素的评估是临床研究的重点。新辅助化疗(NACT)反应的临床评估与治疗后手术标本反应的病理评估之间已证实存在显著差异。我们着重比较了医疗常规中使用的各种诊断方法的价值。
对139例患者在新辅助化疗前后通过体格检查、超声检查和乳腺X线摄影对原发肿瘤和区域淋巴结进行了临床评估。
在肿瘤测量方面,乳腺X线摄影和体格检查与病理结果的相关性最佳,而超声检查是腋窝淋巴结状态最准确的预测指标。
乳腺X线摄影和体格检查是原发性乳腺癌实际大小的最佳非侵入性预测指标,而超声检查与腋窝淋巴结的已证实状态相关性更好。