• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI):院前替罗非班与直接PCI前溶栓治疗的比较

Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison of prehospital tirofiban versus fibrinolysis before direct PCI.

作者信息

Möckel Martin, Bocksch Wolfgang, Strohm Sebastian, Kühnle York, Vollert Jörn, Nibbe Lutz, Dietz Rainer

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 18;103(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.015
PMID:16080980
Abstract

AIMS

Early start of treatment including coronary revascularization has been recognized as crucial variable in the outcome of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The lack of availability and the realisation that an optimum reperfusion strategy will need to incorporate mechanical reperfusion as part of that strategy has led to a great deal of interest in pharmacologic reperfusion combined with mechanical reperfusion or facilitated PCI. It is not clear whether GPIIb/IIIa-blockade or fibrinolysis better facilitates PCI.

METHODS

We identified 138 patients who have been primarily treated by our mobile emergency care mobile from July 2001 until February 2003 with tirofiban or fibrinolysis. Seventy-nine patients had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and available angiograms within 24 h.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients had tirofiban (TIRO; 60.6 S.D. 11.4 years, 64% male) and 35 patients underwent fibrinolysis (FIB; 31.4% tenecteplase, 54.3% reteplase, 11.4% alteplase, 2.9% streptokinase; 58.8 S.D. 12.2 years, 80% male). Data were analyzed with respect to TIMI-flow and corrected frame count (cTFC) before and after PCI, bleeding complications at 30 days and long-term follow up for major adverse events (median 288 days; MACE: Death, hospitalized re-infarction, intracranial hemorrhage). Catheter films were re-analyzed by an investigator blinded to the prehospital therapy. Time from onset of symptoms to first medical contact was 1.98 h in TIRO compared to 0.5 h in FIB (p<0.001) and time from first prehospital medical contact to catheter was 1.46 h in the TIRO compared to 2.85 h in the FIB group (p<0.001). TIMI 3-flow before PCI was observed in 20.5% of TIRO and 62.9% in FIB (p<0.001). After PCI TIMI 3-flow was achieved in 90.5% and 90.0%, respectively (p=n.s.). Final cTFC was 24 in TIRO and 29 in FIB (p=n.s.). Visible thrombi were detected in 30.2% in TIRO and 23.5% in FIB (p=n.s.). Major bleeding occurred in one TIRO patient (fatal lung bleeding after ultima ratio abciximab on top of tirofiban), 2 patients (4.5%) received transfusions. In FIB 2 intracerebral hemorrhages, 5 transfusions (14.3%) and 3 pulmonary bleedings during mandatory ventilation were observed. After 30 days 4.5% in TIRO and 22.9% in FIB had MACE (p=0.015). During long-term follow up the primary endpoint was observed in 4.5% of TIRO and 28.6% (p=0.003) of FIB. Two patients died in TIRO and 9 patients in FIB.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that (1) prehospital start of tirofiban for facilitated PCI is safe and effective if administered by experienced emergency physicians; (2) routine fibrinolysis should be limited to areas where catheter based therapy is not available within 90 min and (3) fibrinolysis should be given for facilitated PCI in randomized trials only at the moment.

摘要

目的

早期开始治疗,包括冠状动脉血运重建,已被认为是急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)预后的关键变量。由于缺乏可用性,并且意识到最佳再灌注策略需要将机械再灌注纳入其中,这引发了人们对药物再灌注联合机械再灌注或易化PCI的极大兴趣。目前尚不清楚糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂或溶栓治疗哪种能更好地促进PCI。

方法

我们确定了138例在2001年7月至2003年2月期间接受替罗非班或溶栓治疗的患者,这些患者均由我们的移动急救医疗队进行初步治疗。79例患者患有ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),并在24小时内进行了血管造影。

结果

44例患者接受替罗非班治疗(TIRO组;平均年龄60.6±11.4岁,男性占64%),35例患者接受溶栓治疗(FIB组;31.4%使用替奈普酶,54.3%使用瑞替普酶,11.4%使用阿替普酶,2.9%使用链激酶;平均年龄58.8±12.2岁,男性占80%)。分析了PCI前后的TIMI血流和校正帧计数(cTFC)、30天时的出血并发症以及主要不良事件的长期随访情况(中位随访时间288天;MACE:死亡、住院再梗死、颅内出血)。由一名对院前治疗不知情的研究人员重新分析导管造影影像。TIRO组从症状发作到首次医疗接触的时间为1.98小时,而FIB组为0.5小时(p<0.001);TIRO组从首次院前医疗接触到导管插入的时间为1.46小时,而FIB组为2.85小时(p<0.001)。PCI前,TIRO组有20.5%观察到TIMI 3级血流,FIB组为62.9%(p<0.001)。PCI后,两组分别有90.5%和90.0%达到TIMI 3级血流(p=无显著差异)。TIRO组最终cTFC为24,FIB组为29(p=无显著差异)。TIRO组有30.2%检测到可见血栓,FIB组为23.5%(p=无显著差异)。TIRO组有1例患者发生严重出血(在替罗非班基础上加用阿昔单抗后出现致命性肺出血),2例患者(4.5%)接受输血。FIB组观察到2例脑出血、5例输血(14.3%)以及3例在强制通气期间发生的肺出血。30天后,TIRO组有4.5%发生MACE,FIB组为22.9%(p=0.015)。在长期随访中,TIRO组有4.5%达到主要终点,FIB组为28.6%(p=0.003)。TIRO组有2例患者死亡,FIB组有9例患者死亡。

结论

我们得出结论:(1)如果由经验丰富的急救医生进行给药,院前开始使用替罗非班进行易化PCI是安全有效的;(2)常规溶栓应仅限于90分钟内无法进行导管介入治疗的地区;(3)目前仅在随机试验中才应将溶栓用于易化PCI。

相似文献

1
Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison of prehospital tirofiban versus fibrinolysis before direct PCI.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI):院前替罗非班与直接PCI前溶栓治疗的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 18;103(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.015.
2
ST-segment recovery and prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction reperfused by prehospital combination fibrinolysis, prehospital initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention, or primary percutaneous coronary intervention.院前联合溶栓、院前启动的易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗再灌注的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的ST段恢复情况及预后
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 1;98(9):1132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.05.044. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
3
Comparison of reperfusion regimens with or without tirofiban in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死中使用或不使用替罗非班的再灌注方案比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Feb 1;93(3):280-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.005.
4
The effects of tirofiban infusion on clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.替罗非班静脉输注对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床及血管造影结果的影响。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Nov;15(11):899-906. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5656. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
5
Randomized comparison of pre-hospital-initiated facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset: the LIPSIA-STEMI trial (Leipzig immediate prehospital facilitated angioplasty in ST-segment myocardial infarction).症状发作后极早期行院前启动的辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗急性心肌梗死的随机比较:LIPSIA-STEMI 试验(莱比锡即刻院前辅助 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死血管成形术)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):605-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.013.
6
Facilitated PCI by combination fibrinolysis or upstream tirofiban in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Alteplase and Tirofiban in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ATAMI) trial.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死中联合纤溶治疗或上游应用替罗非班进行易化PCI:急性心肌梗死中阿替普酶和替罗非班(ATAMI)试验的结果
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 12;130(2):235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.048. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
7
Clinical benefits of adjunctive tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班辅助治疗对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床益处。
Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Jun;19(4):271-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282f487e0.
8
Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis with alteplase (50 mg) plus tirofiban versus alteplase (100 mg) alone in acute myocardial infarction: preliminary findings.急性心肌梗死中阿替普酶(50毫克)联合替罗非班溶栓与单独使用阿替普酶(100毫克)溶栓的安全性和有效性:初步研究结果。
Ital Heart J. 2001 Aug;2(8):605-11.
9
Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial.易化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:“易化介入提高再灌注速度以终止事件(FINESSE)”试验的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2004 Apr;147(4):E16. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.025.
10
Effect of tirofiban therapy on ST segment resolution and clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevated acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty.替罗非班治疗对接受直接血管成形术的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者ST段回落及临床结局的影响。
Cardiology. 2006;105(3):168-75. doi: 10.1159/000091403. Epub 2006 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of low-dose rt-PA with tirofiban to treat acute non-cardiogenic stroke: a single-center randomized controlled study.替罗非班联合小剂量 rt-PA 治疗急性非心源性脑梗死的安全性及有效性:一项单中心随机对照研究。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02808-w.
2
Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention and as the initial medical treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间及作为非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征初始药物治疗时使用的血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 8;2013(11):CD002130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002130.pub4.