Möckel Martin, Bocksch Wolfgang, Strohm Sebastian, Kühnle York, Vollert Jörn, Nibbe Lutz, Dietz Rainer
Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 18;103(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.10.015.
Early start of treatment including coronary revascularization has been recognized as crucial variable in the outcome of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The lack of availability and the realisation that an optimum reperfusion strategy will need to incorporate mechanical reperfusion as part of that strategy has led to a great deal of interest in pharmacologic reperfusion combined with mechanical reperfusion or facilitated PCI. It is not clear whether GPIIb/IIIa-blockade or fibrinolysis better facilitates PCI.
We identified 138 patients who have been primarily treated by our mobile emergency care mobile from July 2001 until February 2003 with tirofiban or fibrinolysis. Seventy-nine patients had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and available angiograms within 24 h.
Forty-four patients had tirofiban (TIRO; 60.6 S.D. 11.4 years, 64% male) and 35 patients underwent fibrinolysis (FIB; 31.4% tenecteplase, 54.3% reteplase, 11.4% alteplase, 2.9% streptokinase; 58.8 S.D. 12.2 years, 80% male). Data were analyzed with respect to TIMI-flow and corrected frame count (cTFC) before and after PCI, bleeding complications at 30 days and long-term follow up for major adverse events (median 288 days; MACE: Death, hospitalized re-infarction, intracranial hemorrhage). Catheter films were re-analyzed by an investigator blinded to the prehospital therapy. Time from onset of symptoms to first medical contact was 1.98 h in TIRO compared to 0.5 h in FIB (p<0.001) and time from first prehospital medical contact to catheter was 1.46 h in the TIRO compared to 2.85 h in the FIB group (p<0.001). TIMI 3-flow before PCI was observed in 20.5% of TIRO and 62.9% in FIB (p<0.001). After PCI TIMI 3-flow was achieved in 90.5% and 90.0%, respectively (p=n.s.). Final cTFC was 24 in TIRO and 29 in FIB (p=n.s.). Visible thrombi were detected in 30.2% in TIRO and 23.5% in FIB (p=n.s.). Major bleeding occurred in one TIRO patient (fatal lung bleeding after ultima ratio abciximab on top of tirofiban), 2 patients (4.5%) received transfusions. In FIB 2 intracerebral hemorrhages, 5 transfusions (14.3%) and 3 pulmonary bleedings during mandatory ventilation were observed. After 30 days 4.5% in TIRO and 22.9% in FIB had MACE (p=0.015). During long-term follow up the primary endpoint was observed in 4.5% of TIRO and 28.6% (p=0.003) of FIB. Two patients died in TIRO and 9 patients in FIB.
We conclude that (1) prehospital start of tirofiban for facilitated PCI is safe and effective if administered by experienced emergency physicians; (2) routine fibrinolysis should be limited to areas where catheter based therapy is not available within 90 min and (3) fibrinolysis should be given for facilitated PCI in randomized trials only at the moment.
早期开始治疗,包括冠状动脉血运重建,已被认为是急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)预后的关键变量。由于缺乏可用性,并且意识到最佳再灌注策略需要将机械再灌注纳入其中,这引发了人们对药物再灌注联合机械再灌注或易化PCI的极大兴趣。目前尚不清楚糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂或溶栓治疗哪种能更好地促进PCI。
我们确定了138例在2001年7月至2003年2月期间接受替罗非班或溶栓治疗的患者,这些患者均由我们的移动急救医疗队进行初步治疗。79例患者患有ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),并在24小时内进行了血管造影。
44例患者接受替罗非班治疗(TIRO组;平均年龄60.6±11.4岁,男性占64%),35例患者接受溶栓治疗(FIB组;31.4%使用替奈普酶,54.3%使用瑞替普酶,11.4%使用阿替普酶,2.9%使用链激酶;平均年龄58.8±12.2岁,男性占80%)。分析了PCI前后的TIMI血流和校正帧计数(cTFC)、30天时的出血并发症以及主要不良事件的长期随访情况(中位随访时间288天;MACE:死亡、住院再梗死、颅内出血)。由一名对院前治疗不知情的研究人员重新分析导管造影影像。TIRO组从症状发作到首次医疗接触的时间为1.98小时,而FIB组为0.5小时(p<0.001);TIRO组从首次院前医疗接触到导管插入的时间为1.46小时,而FIB组为2.85小时(p<0.001)。PCI前,TIRO组有20.5%观察到TIMI 3级血流,FIB组为62.9%(p<0.001)。PCI后,两组分别有90.5%和90.0%达到TIMI 3级血流(p=无显著差异)。TIRO组最终cTFC为24,FIB组为29(p=无显著差异)。TIRO组有30.2%检测到可见血栓,FIB组为23.5%(p=无显著差异)。TIRO组有1例患者发生严重出血(在替罗非班基础上加用阿昔单抗后出现致命性肺出血),2例患者(4.5%)接受输血。FIB组观察到2例脑出血、5例输血(14.3%)以及3例在强制通气期间发生的肺出血。30天后,TIRO组有4.5%发生MACE,FIB组为22.9%(p=0.015)。在长期随访中,TIRO组有4.5%达到主要终点,FIB组为28.6%(p=0.003)。TIRO组有2例患者死亡,FIB组有9例患者死亡。
我们得出结论:(1)如果由经验丰富的急救医生进行给药,院前开始使用替罗非班进行易化PCI是安全有效的;(2)常规溶栓应仅限于90分钟内无法进行导管介入治疗的地区;(3)目前仅在随机试验中才应将溶栓用于易化PCI。