Chengelis Christopher P, Kirkpatrick Jeannie B, Bruner Richard H, Freshwater Les, Morita Osamu, Tamaki Yasushi, Suzuki Hiroyuki
WIL Research Laboratories, LLC, Ashland, OH 44805-9281, USA.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Jan;44(1):98-121. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
Toxicologic and carcinogenic effects of DAG (diacylglycerol) oil, administered in diet for 24 months to Crl:CD((R))(SD)-IGS BR rats, were evaluated using diet-restricted and ad libitum-fed groups. All dietary fat (consistently 5.5%) was provided by DAG and/or the control article, TG (triacylglycerol) oil. Dietary concentrations (% DAG/% TG) were 0%/5.5%, 1%/4.5%, 2.75%/2.75% and 5.5%/0%. Separate groups were fed the 0%/5.5% and 5.5%/0% diets ad libitum. Another group received the standard rodent diet (fat content 4.5%) on the restricted feeding regimen. Clinical condition, ophthalmic findings, palpable mass occurrence, body composition, clinical pathology parameters and incidence of neoplastic lesions were unaffected by DAG in comparison to TG. Groups fed the 5.5% (DAG and/or TG) fat diet when compared to the 4.5% fat diet group displayed lower survival, higher body weights, organ weights, percent body fat, higher fat-related serum chemistry parameters, incidence of microscopic changes in the heart, kidneys, liver, bone marrow, spleen, and incidences of pituitary and mammary gland neoplasms. Parameters more affected in all the ad libitum groups than in the restricted diet groups (regardless of test article) fed the same diet included survival, body weights, body fat, fat-related serum chemistry parameters, and incidences of heart, kidney and liver microscopic changes. However, the DAG and TG ad libitum-fed groups were not different from one another. Thus, DAG-treated animals had no higher risk of carcinogenic effects than rats fed on similar feeding regimens with a diet in which all dietary fat came from TG.
通过饮食限制组和自由采食组,评估了在24个月内给Crl:CD((R))(SD)-IGS BR大鼠喂食二酰甘油(DAG)油的毒理学和致癌作用。所有膳食脂肪(始终为5.5%)均由DAG和/或对照品三酰甘油(TG)油提供。膳食浓度(% DAG/% TG)分别为0%/5.5%、1%/4.5%、2.75%/2.75%和5.5%/0%。分别有自由采食组喂食0%/5.5%和5.5%/0%的饮食。另一组在限制喂食方案下接受标准啮齿动物饮食(脂肪含量4.5%)。与TG相比,DAG对临床状况、眼科检查结果、可触及肿块的出现、身体组成、临床病理参数和肿瘤病变发生率均无影响。与4.5%脂肪饮食组相比,喂食5.5%(DAG和/或TG)脂肪饮食的组存活率较低、体重、器官重量、体脂百分比更高,与脂肪相关的血清化学参数更高,心脏、肾脏、肝脏、骨髓、脾脏的微观变化发生率更高,垂体和乳腺肿瘤的发生率更高。在所有自由采食组中比在喂食相同饮食的限制饮食组(无论测试品如何)中受影响更大的参数包括存活率、体重、体脂、与脂肪相关的血清化学参数,以及心脏、肾脏和肝脏微观变化的发生率。然而,DAG和TG自由采食组之间没有差异。因此,与喂食所有膳食脂肪均来自TG的类似喂食方案的大鼠相比,用DAG处理的动物致癌作用风险并不更高。