Hill Robert V
Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8081, USA.
Syst Biol. 2005 Aug;54(4):530-47. doi: 10.1080/10635150590950326.
Several mutually exclusive hypotheses have been advanced to explain the phylogenetic position of turtles among amniotes. Traditional morphology-based analyses place turtles among extinct anapsids (reptiles with a solid skull roof), whereas more recent studies of both morphological and molecular data support an origin of turtles from within Diapsida (reptiles with a doubly fenestrated skull roof). Evaluation of these conflicting hypotheses has been hampered by nonoverlapping taxonomic samples and the exclusion of significant taxa from published analyses. Furthermore, although data from soft tissues and anatomical systems such as the integument may be particularly relevant to this problem, they are often excluded from large-scale analyses of morphological systematics. Here, conflicting hypotheses of turtle relationships are tested by (1) combining published data into a supermatrix of morphological characters to address issues of character conflict and missing data; (2) increasing taxonomic sampling by more than doubling the number of operational taxonomic units to test internal relationships within suprageneric ingroup taxa; and (3) increasing character sampling by approximately 25% by adding new data on the osteology and histology of the integument, an anatomical system that has been historically underrepresented in morphological systematics. The morphological data set assembled here represents the largest yet compiled for Amniota. Reevaluation of character data from prior studies of amniote phylogeny favors the hypothesis that turtles indeed have diapsid affinities. Addition of new ingroup taxa alone leads to a decrease in overall phylogenetic resolution, indicating that existing characters used for amniote phylogeny are insufficient to explain the evolution of more highly nested taxa. Incorporation of new data from the soft and osseous components of the integument, however, helps resolve relationships among both basal and highly nested amniote taxa. Analysis of a data set compiled from published sources and data original to this study supports monophyly of Amniota, Synapsida, Reptilia, Parareptilia, Eureptilia, Eosuchia, Diapsida, Neodiapsida, Sauria, Lepidosauria, and Archosauriformes, as well as several more highly nested divisions within the latter two clades. Turtles are here resolved as the sister taxon to a monophyletic Lepidosauria (squamates + Sphenodon), a novel phylogenetic position that nevertheless is consistent with recent molecular and morphological studies that have hypothesized diapsid affinities for this clade.
为了解释龟鳖目在羊膜动物中的系统发育位置,人们提出了几种相互排斥的假说。基于传统形态学的分析将龟鳖目置于已灭绝的无孔亚纲(具有坚固头骨顶的爬行动物)之中,而最近对形态学和分子数据的研究则支持龟鳖目起源于双孔亚纲(具有双重开孔头骨顶的爬行动物)内部。由于分类样本不重叠以及已发表分析中排除了重要类群,对这些相互矛盾的假说的评估受到了阻碍。此外,尽管来自软组织和解剖系统(如皮肤)的数据可能与这个问题特别相关,但它们在形态系统学的大规模分析中往往被排除在外。在这里,通过以下方式对龟鳖目关系的相互矛盾的假说进行了检验:(1)将已发表的数据合并到一个形态特征超级矩阵中,以解决特征冲突和数据缺失的问题;(2)通过将操作分类单元的数量增加一倍以上来增加分类样本,以检验超属内类群分类单元内部的关系;(3)通过添加关于皮肤骨学和组织学的新数据,将特征样本增加约25%,皮肤是一个在形态系统学中历史代表性不足的解剖系统。这里组装的形态学数据集代表了迄今为止为羊膜动物编制的最大数据集。对先前羊膜动物系统发育研究的特征数据重新评估支持了龟鳖目确实具有双孔类亲缘关系的假说。仅添加新的内群分类单元就会导致整体系统发育分辨率下降,这表明用于羊膜动物系统发育的现有特征不足以解释更高层次嵌套分类单元的进化。然而,纳入来自皮肤软组织和骨组织的新数据有助于解决基部和高度嵌套的羊膜动物分类单元之间的关系。对从已发表来源和本研究原始数据汇编而成的数据集的分析支持了羊膜动物、合弓纲、爬行纲、副爬行纲、真爬行纲、始鳄目、双孔亚纲、新双孔亚纲、蜥蜴类、鳞龙超目和主龙形下纲的单系性,以及后两个类群中几个更高层次嵌套的分类。在这里,龟鳖目被解析为单系鳞龙超目(有鳞目 + 楔齿蜥)的姐妹分类单元,这是一个新的系统发育位置,但与最近假设该类群具有双孔类亲缘关系的分子和形态学研究一致。