Doody R, Pavlik V, Massman Paul, Kenan Mary, Yeh Stephanie, Powell Suzanne, Cooke Norma, Dyer Carmel, Demirovic Jasenka, Waring S, Chan Wenyaw
Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;20(2-3):198-208. doi: 10.1159/000087300. Epub 2005 Aug 3.
Large and diverse dementia patient cohorts can further a variety of research programs aimed at improving diagnosis, treatment, and meaningful survival in AD.
We recruited 1,502 dementia patients between 1989 and 2002, subclassified using standardized criteria and laboratory procedures, and treated according to established guidelines. Baseline clinical and psychometric measures were repeated annually, in person or by use of a multi-modal telephone follow-up program that included many of the measures obtained at in-person visits. We tracked vital status of all subjects at 6-month intervals and offered autopsies to all participants. We assessed for cohort effects in baseline characteristics by 2-year intervals, examined the characteristics and outcomes for those who remained active compared to those who were eventually lost to follow-up, examined survival times for demographic or diagnostic subgroups, and assessed the accuracy of clinical diagnoses versus neuropathology.
The average age at entry, average educational level, and baseline MMSE scores for subjects are increasing over time, and probable AD diagnoses are also increasing. Most (80.6%) subjects have remained active in our Center; those who did not were more likely to have a non-AD diagnosis. Survival averages 5.2 years (CI 4.98--5.37) and is influenced by age and gender, but not by diagnosis of probable versus possible AD. Our diagnostic accuracy is 89.6%, with high sensitivity to the presence of AD (96%).
In a large and representative clinical cohort, the demographics of AD are changing over time. Careful analyses of those who continue and those who drop out from follow-up suggest that atypical diagnosis, rather than severity or demographic issues accounts for most of the attrition. Clinicians are likely to encounter increasingly older patients with milder disease, and these trends have implications for the design of clinical trials. Survival from the onset of first symptoms, similar for probable and possible AD cases, may be increasing over time.
规模庞大且多样化的痴呆症患者队列能够推动各种旨在改善阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断、治疗及有意义生存期的研究项目。
我们在1989年至2002年间招募了1502名痴呆症患者,使用标准化标准和实验室程序进行亚分类,并按照既定指南进行治疗。每年亲自或通过多模式电话随访程序重复进行基线临床和心理测量,该程序包含了许多亲自就诊时获得的测量项目。我们每6个月追踪所有受试者的生命状态,并为所有参与者提供尸检。我们每隔2年评估基线特征中的队列效应,比较仍保持参与研究的患者与最终失访患者的特征及结局,检查不同人口统计学或诊断亚组的生存时间,并评估临床诊断与神经病理学诊断的准确性。
受试者的平均入组年龄、平均教育水平和基线简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分随时间增加,可能的AD诊断也在增加。大多数(80.6%)受试者在我们中心保持参与研究;未保持参与的受试者更可能患有非AD诊断。平均生存期为5.2年(可信区间4.98 - 5.37),受年龄和性别影响,但不受可能AD与疑似AD诊断的影响。我们的诊断准确率为89.6%,对AD存在的敏感性较高(96%)。
在一个规模庞大且具有代表性的临床队列中,AD的人口统计学特征随时间变化。对持续参与和退出随访的患者进行仔细分析表明,非典型诊断而非病情严重程度或人口统计学问题是导致大多数失访的原因。临床医生可能会遇到病情较轻但年龄越来越大的患者,这些趋势对临床试验设计具有启示意义。从首次症状出现开始计算的生存期,可能AD与疑似AD病例相似,且可能随时间增加。