Suppr超能文献

C反应蛋白在急诊科菌血症患者中的诊断应用。

Diagnostic use of C-reactive protein in bacteraemic emergency department patients.

作者信息

Adams Nicholas G

机构信息

Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Aug;17(4):371-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00759.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess C-reactive protein (CRP) as a marker of bacteraemia in ED patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a convenience sample of adult patients was conducted at an urban, tertiary care, academic ED. Patients were included in the present study if they had CRP and blood cultures taken during their ED assessment. Neutropenic patients were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios for CRP in the detection of bacteraemia were calculated.

RESULTS

Over a 12 month period 1214 patients were included in the present study. Blood cultures were positive in 77 (6.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-7.6%), and contaminated in 33 (2.7%, 95% CI 1.8-3.6%). An elevated CRP was 94% sensitive (95% CI 86-98%) and 18% specific (95% CI 16-20%) for concurrent bacteraemia. The positive likelihood ratio for bacteraemia with an elevated CRP was 1.15 (95% CI 1.07-1.23), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.33 (95% CI 0.23-0.49).

CONCLUSION

Although the present study has limitations, it appears to show that CRP has limited diagnostic utility for the detection of bacteraemia in ED patients.

摘要

目的

评估C反应蛋白(CRP)作为急诊科患者菌血症标志物的价值。

方法

在一家城市三级医疗学术急诊科对成年患者的便利样本进行回顾性研究。纳入本研究的患者为在急诊科评估期间进行了CRP检测和血培养的患者。排除中性粒细胞减少患者。计算CRP检测菌血症的敏感性、特异性、预测值和似然比。

结果

在12个月期间,本研究共纳入1214例患者。血培养阳性77例(6.3%,95%置信区间[CI]5.0 - 7.6%),污染33例(2.7%,95%CI 1.8 - 3.6%)。CRP升高对并发菌血症的敏感性为94%(95%CI 86 - 98%),特异性为18%(95%CI 16 - 20%)。CRP升高时菌血症的阳性似然比为1.15(95%CI 1.07 - 1.23),阴性似然比为0.33(95%CI 0.23 - 0.49)。

结论

尽管本研究存在局限性,但似乎表明CRP在检测急诊科患者菌血症方面的诊断效用有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验