Bento A Patrícia, Solà Miquel, Bickelhaupt F Matthias
Afdeling Theoretische Chemie, Scheikundig Laboratorium der Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1083, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Comput Chem. 2005 Nov 15;26(14):1497-504. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20261.
To obtain a set of consistent benchmark potential energy surfaces (PES) for the two archetypal nucleophilic substitution reactions of the chloride anion at carbon in chloromethane (S(N)2@C) and at silicon in chlorosilane (S(N)2@Si), we have explored these PESes using a hierarchical series of ab initio methods [HF, MP2, MP4SDQ, CCSD, CCSD(T)] in combination with a hierarchical series of six Gaussian-type basis sets, up to g polarization. Relative energies of stationary points are converged to within 0.01 to 0.56 kcal/mol as a function of the basis-set size. Our best estimate, at CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ, for the relative energies of the [Cl(-), CH(3)Cl] reactant complex, the Cl-CH(3)-Cl transition state and the stable Cl-SiH(3)-Cl transition complex is -10.42, +2.52, and -27.10 kcal/mol, respectively. Furthermore, we have investigated the performance for these reactions of four popular density functionals, namely, BP86, BLYP, B3LYP, and OLYP, in combination with a large doubly polarized Slater-type basis set of triple-zeta quality (TZ2P). Best overall agreement with our CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ benchmark is obtained with OLYP and B3LYP. However, OLYP performs better for the S(N)2@C overall and central barriers, which it underestimates by 2.65 and 4.05 kcal/mol, respectively. The other DFT approaches underestimate these barriers by some 4.8 (B3LYP) to 9.0 kcal/mol (BLYP).
为了获得一组用于氯甲烷中碳上氯离子的两个典型亲核取代反应(S(N)2@C)以及氯硅烷中硅上氯离子的亲核取代反应(S(N)2@Si)的一致基准势能面(PES),我们使用了一系列从头算方法[HF、MP2、MP4SDQ、CCSD、CCSD(T)]与一系列六个高斯型基组(直至g极化)相结合来探索这些PES。随着基组大小的变化,驻点的相对能量收敛到0.01至0.56千卡/摩尔范围内。我们在CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ水平下对[Cl(-), CH(3)Cl]反应物复合物、Cl-CH(3)-Cl过渡态和稳定Cl-SiH(3)-Cl过渡复合物的相对能量的最佳估计分别为-10.42、+2.52和-27.10千卡/摩尔。此外,我们研究了四种流行密度泛函(即BP86、BLYP、B3LYP和OLYP)与一个大的三重ζ质量的双极化斯莱特型基组(TZ2P)相结合对这些反应的性能。OLYP和B3LYP与我们的CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ基准的总体一致性最佳。然而,OLYP在S(N)2@C的总体和中心势垒方面表现更好,它分别低估了2.65和4.05千卡/摩尔。其他DFT方法对这些势垒的低估约为4.8(B3LYP)至9.0千卡/摩尔(BLYP)。