• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科临床试验中的招募:伦理视角

Recruitment in pediatric clinical trials: an ethical perspective.

作者信息

Afshar Kourosh, Lodha Abhay, Costei Adriana, Vaneyke Nancy

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):835-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169135.17634.bc.

DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000169135.17634.bc
PMID:16093965
Abstract

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of clinical trials in pediatric surgical disciplines. This is partly due to difficulties in recruiting participants. Frequently the origin of these problems lies in the ethical issues surrounding clinical trials in children. We reviewed the ethical barriers to recruitment in pediatric clinical trials and present recommendations to increase recruitment without violating accepted ethical boundaries.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google engines was performed. All available North American guidelines were reviewed. Guidelines at a major North American center were also reviewed as an example of institutional directives.

RESULTS

Seven categories of ethical issues hampering recruitment were identified. The perspectives of different investigators are discussed as well as their recommended practical approaches to resolve the issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Several recommendations are presented to help investigators enhance approval and recruitment rates in clinical trials involving children.

摘要

目的

儿科外科学科的临床试验较少。这部分是由于招募参与者存在困难。这些问题的根源往往在于围绕儿童临床试验的伦理问题。我们回顾了儿科临床试验招募中的伦理障碍,并提出了在不违反公认伦理界限的情况下增加招募的建议。

方法与材料

使用MEDLINE、EMBASE和谷歌搜索引擎进行文献检索。审查了所有可用的北美指南。还审查了北美一个主要中心的指南,作为机构指令的示例。

结果

确定了阻碍招募的七类伦理问题。讨论了不同研究者的观点以及他们推荐的解决这些问题的实际方法。

结论

提出了一些建议,以帮助研究者提高涉及儿童的临床试验的获批率和招募率。

相似文献

1
Recruitment in pediatric clinical trials: an ethical perspective.儿科临床试验中的招募:伦理视角
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):835-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169135.17634.bc.
2
Ethical issues of clinical trials in children: a European perspective.儿童临床试验的伦理问题:欧洲视角
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Jun;94(6):474-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.149898. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
3
Clinical report--guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations.临床报告——评估儿科人群用药的研究伦理行为指南。
Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):850-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0082. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
4
Issues related to children participating in clinical research.与儿童参与临床研究相关的问题。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Aug;22(4):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2007.02.004.
5
Financial remuneration for clinical and behavioral research participation: ethical and practical considerations.临床和行为研究参与的经济报酬:伦理与实际考量
Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
6
Research in children.儿童研究。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3 Suppl):S131-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054905.39382.58.
7
Clinical trials in pediatric traumatic brain injury: unique challenges and potential responses.儿童创伤性脑损伤的临床试验:独特挑战与潜在应对措施
Dev Neurosci. 2006;28(4-5):276-90. doi: 10.1159/000094154.
8
Enrolling the uninsured in clinical trials: an ethical perspective.让未参保者参与临床试验:伦理视角
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3 Suppl):S121-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054907.33928.48.
9
Preserving consent-for-consent with feasibility-assessment and recruitment in clinical studies: FARSITE architecture.在临床研究中通过可行性评估和招募来保持同意的同意:FARSITE架构。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;147:137-48.
10
Ethical issues in pediatric trials.儿科试验中的伦理问题。
Am Heart J. 2001 Aug;142(2):233-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.117065.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review.家长对参与研究的促进因素和障碍的看法:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058067.
2
Facilitators and barriers of children's participation in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions: A systematic review.促进和阻碍儿童参与营养、身体活动和肥胖干预的因素:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2021 Dec;22(12):e13335. doi: 10.1111/obr.13335. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
3
Ethical considerations of researchers conducting pediatric clinical drug trials: a qualitative survey in two Belgian university children's hospitals.
研究者开展儿科临床药物试验的伦理考量:在比利时两所大学儿童医院开展的定性调查。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;177(7):1003-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3151-9. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Lessons learned on recruitment and retention in hard-to-reach families in a phase III randomised controlled trial of preparatory information for children undergoing general anaesthesia.在一项针对接受全身麻醉儿童的术前准备信息的III期随机对照试验中,关于招募和留住难以接触到的家庭的经验教训。
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0411-4.
5
Patient recruitment into a multicenter randomized clinical trial for kidney disease: report of the focal segmental glomerulosclerosis clinical trial (FSGS CT).招募肾脏病多中心随机临床试验患者:局灶节段性肾小球硬化症临床试验报告(FSGS CT)。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb;6(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/cts.12003. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
6
Frontline ethical issues in pediatric clinical research: ethical and regulatory aspects of seven current bottlenecks in pediatric clinical research.儿科临床研究中的前沿伦理问题:儿科临床研究中七个当前瓶颈的伦理和监管方面。
Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Dec;169(12):1541-8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1268-6. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
7
Ethical principles and legal requirements for pediatric research in the EU: an analysis of the European normative and legal framework surrounding pediatric clinical trials.欧盟儿科研究的伦理原则和法律要求:对围绕儿科临床试验的欧洲规范和法律框架的分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2009 Oct;168(10):1225-34. doi: 10.1007/s00431-008-0915-7. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
8
Strengths and pitfalls of meta-analysis reports in vesicoureteral reflux.膀胱输尿管反流的Meta分析报告的优势与缺陷
Adv Urol. 2008;2008:295492. doi: 10.1155/2008/295492.