• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习曲线之后机器人根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期并发症

Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve.

作者信息

Bhandari Akshay, McIntire Linda, Kaul Sanjeev A, Hemal Ashok K, Peabody James O, Menon Mani

机构信息

Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):915-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169458.96014.f8.

DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000169458.96014.f8
PMID:16093987
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the incidence of and analyzed factors that contributed to perioperative complications in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy, that is Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy (VIP), at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recorded operative and postoperative data on 300 consecutive patients who underwent VIP at our institution during a 1-year period. All operations were performed by 1 of 2 surgeons (MM or JOP). We reviewed the complications seen in these patients.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality and no case was converted to open surgery. A total of 269 (89.7%) patients were considered to have an ideal postoperative course, ie they were discharged home within 48 hours with no unscheduled office visits or complications. There were 14 unscheduled postoperative visits (4.7%) for transient urinary retention after early catheter removal (13) or hematuria (1). There were 17 complications, of which 16 (5.3%) were related to surgery and 1 was related to anesthesia. A total of 11 complications (3.7%) were minor (grade I) and 5 (1.7%) were major (grade II). Of them 3 (1%) patients required reoperation. There were no grade III or IV complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In our hands VIP is a safe operation with an overall complication rate of 5.3%, a major complication rate of less than 2% and a surgical re-intervention rate of 1%.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在我院接受机器人根治性前列腺切除术(即瓦提库蒂研究所前列腺切除术,VIP)患者围手术期并发症的发生率,并分析了导致这些并发症的因素。

材料与方法

我们记录了在1年期间于我院连续接受VIP手术的300例患者的手术及术后数据。所有手术均由两名外科医生(MM或JOP)中的一位完成。我们回顾了这些患者出现的并发症。

结果

无手术死亡病例,也无病例转为开放手术。共有269例(89.7%)患者被认为术后恢复理想,即他们在48小时内出院,无需进行非计划的门诊就诊或出现并发症。有14例(4.7%)非计划的术后门诊就诊,原因是早期拔除导尿管后出现短暂性尿潴留(13例)或血尿(1例)。共有17例并发症,其中16例(5.3%)与手术相关,1例与麻醉相关。共有11例并发症(3.7%)为轻度(I级),5例(1.7%)为重度(II级)。其中3例(1%)患者需要再次手术。无III级或IV级并发症。

结论

在我们手中,VIP手术是安全的,总体并发症发生率为5.3%,重度并发症发生率低于2%,手术再次干预率为1%。

相似文献

1
Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve.学习曲线之后机器人根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期并发症
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):915-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169458.96014.f8.
2
[Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies].[我们最初250例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的并发症及发生率]
Actas Urol Esp. 2010 May;34(5):428-39.
3
The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon.单外科医生行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术减少并发症的学习曲线。
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):420-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09847.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
4
Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.使用机器人接口将开放手术技能成功转移至腹腔镜环境:腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的初步经验
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1738-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092881.24608.5e.
5
A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的直接比较:单机构经验
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.111. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
6
Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的短期疗效比较。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
7
Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术住院时间的比较。
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):929-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.070.
8
Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon.接受过 fellowship 培训的腹腔镜外科医生的机器人根治性前列腺切除术学习曲线。
J Endourol. 2007 Apr;21(4):441-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0239.
9
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience in a high-volume laparoscopy reference centre.机器人辅助经腹腹腔镜前列腺根治术:在高容量腹腔镜参考中心的经验。
BJU Int. 2010 Apr;105(8):1155-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09013.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
ANESTHESIA FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - A CHALLENGE FOR ANAESTHESIOLOGIST.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的麻醉——对麻醉师的挑战。
Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Oct;61(Suppl 3):76-80. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.11.
2
Comparison of the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on hospital stay in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a retrospective study.比较罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼与布比卡因复合舒芬太尼用于剖宫产术后硬膜外自控镇痛的效果。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul 21;20(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01088-6.
3
An observational study: Effects of tenting of the abdominal wall on peak airway pressure in robotic radical prostatectomy surgery.
一项观察性研究:腹壁帐篷效应在机器人根治性前列腺切除术对气道峰值压力的影响。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):279-282. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_560_16.
4
The effect of body characteristics on mean operative times while experiencing the learning curve for robotic prostatectomy.在经历机器人前列腺切除术学习曲线时,身体特征对平均手术时间的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):71-4. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0138-6. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
5
Older age does not impact perioperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.年龄较大对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的围手术期并发症并无影响。
J Robot Surg. 2011 Sep;5(3):201-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0251-1. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
6
Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的麻醉管理及结果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):273-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0379-7. Epub 2012 Sep 22.
7
Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for a single experienced surgeon: comparison with simultaneous laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.单一经验丰富的外科医生进行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:与同期腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的比较。
World J Mens Health. 2015 Apr;33(1):30-5. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.1.30. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
Anesthesia considerations for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a review of 1,500 cases.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的麻醉考量:1500例病例回顾
J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):119-23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0024-z. Epub 2007 May 30.
9
Does robotic prostatectomy meet its promise in the management of prostate cancer?机器人前列腺切除术在前列腺癌治疗中是否如其承诺的那样有效?
Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Jun;14(3):184-91. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0327-8.
10
Dedicated robotics team reduces pre-surgical preparation time.专业机器人团队缩短了术前准备时间。
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jul;28(3):263-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.102696.