Stevens Michael J
Department of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4620, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(4):507-26. doi: 10.1002/bsl.652.
Terrorism has a long history, which continues to unfold, and takes many forms. Notwithstanding these facts, there is no generally accepted definition of terrorism. I set forth the definitional issues that underlie the current debate about terrorism. By comparing terrorism with various forms of violence, I argue that it is plausible to construe terrorism as crime and, in support of this, I demonstrate why terrorism cannot be morally justified. Next, I cluster various immediate and long-term approaches intended to prevent terrorism, highlighting psychologically based strategies, such as behavioral profiling, teaching tolerance and citizenship, modifying media images of terrorism, and building peace. In order to understand and respond more effectively to 21st-century terrorism, I advocate adoption of a multidisciplinary, contextually sensitive approach.
恐怖主义有着悠久的历史,且仍在不断演变,形式多样。尽管如此,对于恐怖主义却没有一个普遍认可的定义。我阐述了当前关于恐怖主义辩论背后的定义问题。通过将恐怖主义与各种形式的暴力进行比较,我认为将恐怖主义解释为犯罪是合理的,并且为此进行论证,说明恐怖主义在道德上无法被正当化。接下来,我将各种旨在预防恐怖主义的直接和长期方法进行分类,着重强调基于心理学的策略,如行为剖析、教授宽容和公民意识、改变媒体对恐怖主义的形象以及建设和平。为了更有效地理解和应对21世纪的恐怖主义,我主张采用一种多学科、因地制宜的方法。