Murphy Megan J, Wright David W
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, 4380 Palmer Building, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-4380, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2005 Jul;31(3):283-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01569.x.
In this study, we examined the use of power in the supervisory relationship from supervisees' perspectives. Semistructured interviews of 11 supervisees in a Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family Therapy Education training program were conducted. From analysis of interview transcripts, themes about the ways in which supervisors and supervisees used power in the supervisory relationship emerged. Supervisors' power uses included discussions of power, empowering supervisees, promoting an atmosphere of safety, collaborating with supervisees, imposition of style/orientation, and misuses of power, such as violation of confidentiality. Themes for supervisees' power uses included supervisee-peer power, supervisees as consumers, and withholding information. Implications for researchers, supervisors, and supervisees are presented.
在本研究中,我们从被督导者的角度审视了督导关系中权力的运用情况。我们对婚姻与家庭治疗教育认证委员会培训项目中的11名被督导者进行了半结构化访谈。通过对访谈记录的分析,出现了关于督导者和被督导者在督导关系中运用权力方式的主题。督导者运用权力的方式包括权力讨论、赋予被督导者权力、营造安全氛围、与被督导者合作、强加风格/取向以及权力滥用,如违反保密规定。被督导者运用权力的主题包括被督导者之间的权力、被督导者作为消费者以及隐瞒信息。本文还阐述了对研究者、督导者和被督导者的启示。