Knox Sarah, Burkard Alan W, Edwards Lisa M, Smith Jacquelyn J, Schlosser Lewis Z
Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, School of Education, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
Psychother Res. 2008 Sep;18(5):543-59. doi: 10.1080/10503300801982781.
Using consensual qualitative research, researchers interviewed 16 supervisors regarding their use of self-disclosure in supervision. Supervisors reported that their prior training in supervisor self-disclosure (SRSD) came via didactic sources and encouraged judicious use of SRSD. Supervisors used SRSD to enhance supervisee development and normalize their experiences; supervisors did not use SRSD when it derailed supervision or was developmentally inappropriate for supervisees. In describing specific examples of the intervention, SRSD occurred in good supervision relationships, was stimulated by supervisees struggling, was intended to teach or normalize, and focused on supervisors' reactions to their own or their supervisees' clients. SRSD yielded largely positive effects on supervisors, supervisees, the supervision relationship, and supervisors' supervision of others.
通过采用共识定性研究方法,研究人员就16位督导员在督导过程中自我表露的使用情况进行了访谈。督导员报告称,他们之前接受的督导员自我表露(SRSD)培训来自于说教式来源,并鼓励审慎使用SRSD。督导员使用SRSD来促进被督导者的发展并使其经历正常化;当SRSD使督导偏离正轨或对被督导者的发展不合适时,督导员不会使用它。在描述干预的具体例子时,SRSD发生在良好的督导关系中,由被督导者的挣扎所激发,旨在传授知识或使经历正常化,并侧重于督导员对自己或其被督导者的客户的反应。SRSD在很大程度上对督导员、被督导者、督导关系以及督导员对他人的督导产生了积极影响。