Suppr超能文献

猪等容血液稀释期间的静脉血氧饱和度。

Venous oxygen saturation during normovolaemic haemodilution in the pig.

作者信息

Krantz T, Warberg J, Secher N H

机构信息

Copenhagen Muscle Research Center, Department of Anesthesia, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1149-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00778.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypovolaemia may be considered to represent a volume-restricted cardiac output (CO), but CO varies inversely with the haemoglobin concentration (Hb) and a maximal mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) may be a better target for volume administration than a maximal CO.

METHODS

In 10 anaesthetized pigs, volume loading with 6% hydroxyethyl starch was performed to obtain a maximal SvO2 followed by normovolaemic haemodilution with 6% hydroxyethyl starch.

RESULTS

Volume loading increased SvO2 from 55.0+/-5.2% to 64.8+/-9.0% (mean+/-SD) associated with an increase in CO (2.3+/-0.4 to 3.5+/-0.9 l/min) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2; 68.2+/-9.3% to 79.4+/-7.2%; P<0.05). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial (MAP), central venous (CVP), pulmonary arterial mean (PAMP), and occlusion pressures (PAOP) increased as well (P<0.05). In contrast, during progressive haemodilution, SvO2 and ScvO2 remained statistically unchanged until the haemoglobin concentration had decreased from 5.5+/-0.4 to 2.9+/-0.2 mM, while CO and HR increased at a haemoglobin value of 4.4+/-0.4 and 4.0+/-0.4 mM and CVP and PAOP decreased at a haemoglobin of 4.0+/-0.4 and 2.9+/-0.2 mM, respectively (P<0.05) leaving MAP unaffected.

CONCLUSION

This study found that volume loading increased cardiac output and mixed and central venous oxygen saturations in parallel, but during normovolaemic haemodilution an increase in cardiac output left mixed and central venous oxygen saturations statistically unchanged until haemoglobin concentration was reduced by approximately 50%. Accordingly, volume therapy should be directed to maintain a high venous oxygen saturation rather than a change in cardiac output.

摘要

背景

低血容量可被视为代表容量受限的心输出量(CO),但心输出量与血红蛋白浓度(Hb)呈反比,最大混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)可能比最大心输出量更适合作为容量管理的目标。

方法

对10只麻醉猪进行6%羟乙基淀粉容量负荷以获得最大SvO2,随后用6%羟乙基淀粉进行正常血容量性血液稀释。

结果

容量负荷使SvO2从55.0±5.2%增加至64.8±9.0%(均值±标准差),同时心输出量增加(从2.3±0.4升至3.5±0.9升/分钟)以及中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)增加(从68.2±9.3%升至79.4±7.2%;P<0.05)。心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、肺动脉平均压(PAMP)和阻塞压(PAOP)也升高(P<0.05)。相比之下,在进行性血液稀释过程中,SvO2和ScvO2在统计学上保持不变,直到血红蛋白浓度从5.5±0.4降至2.9±0.2 mM,而心输出量和心率在血红蛋白值为4.4±0.4和4.0±0.4 mM时增加,CVP和PAOP分别在血红蛋白为4.0±0.4和2.9±0.2 mM时降低(P<0.05),MAP不受影响。

结论

本研究发现容量负荷使心输出量以及混合静脉和中心静脉血氧饱和度同时增加,但在正常血容量性血液稀释期间,心输出量增加在统计学上并未使混合静脉和中心静脉血氧饱和度发生变化,直到血红蛋白浓度降低约50%。因此,容量治疗应旨在维持高静脉血氧饱和度而非改变心输出量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验