• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本一项关于舍曲林治疗惊恐障碍的安慰剂对照随机撤药研究。

A placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study of sertraline for panic disorder in Japan.

作者信息

Kamijima Kunitoshi, Kuboki Tomifusa, Kumano Hiroaki, Burt Tal, Cohen Guy, Arano Ichiro, Hamasaki Toshimitsu

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Sep;20(5):265-73. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000171518.25963.63.

DOI:10.1097/01.yic.0000171518.25963.63
PMID:16096517
Abstract

The objective of this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sertraline for 8 weeks in treating Japanese patients with DSM-IV panic disorder. Patients (n=394) were initially treated with 8 weeks of open-label sertraline followed by 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with either sertraline (50-100 mg/day) or placebo. Responders during the open-label phase were eligible to be entered into the double-blind phase. Two hundred and forty patients were entered to the double-blind phase and randomly assigned to receive sertraline (n=119) or placebo (n=121). On the primary efficacy measure (relapse), there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (sertraline 10.1%; placebo 13.2%). However, the frequency of panic attacks was significantly (P=0.012) lower for sertraline compared to placebo. The proportion of sertraline-treated patients who met response criteria (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale score of 1 or 2) at the end of double-blind phase treatment was also significantly (P=0.003) higher for sertraline (89.9%) compared to placebo (74.4%). Panic Disorder Severity Scale total score was significantly (P=0.012) lower in the sertraline group compared to the placebo group. Adverse events during acute treatment were consistent with the known adverse event profile of sertraline, and the incidence of adverse events during the double-blind phase treatment was not different between sertraline and placebo.

摘要

这项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机撤药研究的目的是评估舍曲林治疗日本DSM-IV惊恐障碍患者8周的疗效和安全性。患者(n = 394)最初接受8周的开放标签舍曲林治疗,随后接受8周的双盲治疗,治疗药物为舍曲林(50 - 100毫克/天)或安慰剂。开放标签阶段的应答者有资格进入双盲阶段。240名患者进入双盲阶段,并随机分配接受舍曲林(n = 119)或安慰剂(n = 121)治疗。在主要疗效指标(复发)方面,两个治疗组之间没有显著差异(舍曲林组为10.1%;安慰剂组为13.2%)。然而,与安慰剂相比,舍曲林治疗的惊恐发作频率显著更低(P = 0.012)。在双盲阶段治疗结束时,达到应答标准(临床总体印象改善量表评分为1或2)的舍曲林治疗患者比例也显著更高(P = 0.003),舍曲林组为89.9%,而安慰剂组为74.4%。与安慰剂组相比,舍曲林组的惊恐障碍严重程度量表总分显著更低(P = 0.012)。急性治疗期间的不良事件与舍曲林已知的不良事件特征一致,双盲阶段治疗期间舍曲林组和安慰剂组的不良事件发生率没有差异。

相似文献

1
A placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study of sertraline for panic disorder in Japan.日本一项关于舍曲林治疗惊恐障碍的安慰剂对照随机撤药研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Sep;20(5):265-73. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000171518.25963.63.
2
Sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder: a flexible-dose multicenter trial.舍曲林治疗惊恐障碍:一项灵活剂量多中心试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;55(11):1010-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.11.1010.
3
Sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder: a double-blind multicenter trial.舍曲林治疗惊恐障碍:一项双盲多中心试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;155(9):1189-95. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.9.1189.
4
Sertraline treatment of panic disorder: response in patients at risk for poor outcome.舍曲林治疗惊恐障碍:预后不良风险患者的反应
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;61(12):922-7.
5
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy and tolerability of sertraline in Iranian veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder.一项关于舍曲林在伊朗创伤后应激障碍退伍军人中的疗效和耐受性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Psychol Med. 2011 Oct;41(10):2159-66. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711000201. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
The efficacy of sertraline in panic disorder: combined results from two fixed-dose studies.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Nov;15(6):335-42. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200015060-00004.
7
Sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder. A multi-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose investigation.舍曲林治疗惊恐障碍:一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、固定剂量研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;173:54-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.173.1.54.
8
Efficacy of sertraline in a 12-week trial for generalized anxiety disorder.舍曲林在广泛性焦虑症12周试验中的疗效。
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;161(9):1642-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1642.
9
Sertraline versus paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder: an acute, double-blind noninferiority comparison.舍曲林与帕罗西汀治疗惊恐障碍的疗效比较:一项急性、双盲非劣效性对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;65(3):405-13. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0317.
10
Early coadministration of clonazepam with sertraline for panic disorder.氯硝西泮与舍曲林早期联合用于治疗惊恐障碍。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;58(7):681-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.7.681.

引用本文的文献

1
Pilot study of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression for treatment response to escitalopram in panic disorder.惊恐障碍中艾司西酞普兰治疗反应的全基因组DNA甲基化和基因表达的初步研究。
World J Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 19;13(8):524-532. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i8.524.
2
Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults.成人抑郁和焦虑障碍中长效抗抑郁药停药与继续使用的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 15;4(4):CD013495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013495.pub2.
3
The association between serotonin-related gene polymorphisms and susceptibility and early sertraline response in patients with panic disorder.
血清素相关基因多态性与惊恐障碍患者的易感性和早期舍曲林反应的关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 28;20(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02790-y.
4
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.
5
Risk of relapse after antidepressant discontinuation in anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of relapse prevention trials.焦虑症、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍患者停用抗抑郁药后的复发风险:预防复发试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2017 Sep 13;358:j3927. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3927.
6
Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study.行业资助的抗抑郁药和抗精神病药临床试验注册库与期刊文章中严重不良事件报告的差异:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 9;4(7):e005535. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005535.
7
Comorbid anxiety in bipolar disorder alters treatment and prognosis.双相情感障碍中的共病焦虑会改变治疗方式和预后。
Psychiatr Q. 2008 Jun;79(2):139-50. doi: 10.1007/s11126-008-9071-5. Epub 2008 May 20.