Kamijima Kunitoshi, Kuboki Tomifusa, Kumano Hiroaki, Burt Tal, Cohen Guy, Arano Ichiro, Hamasaki Toshimitsu
Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Sep;20(5):265-73. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000171518.25963.63.
The objective of this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sertraline for 8 weeks in treating Japanese patients with DSM-IV panic disorder. Patients (n=394) were initially treated with 8 weeks of open-label sertraline followed by 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with either sertraline (50-100 mg/day) or placebo. Responders during the open-label phase were eligible to be entered into the double-blind phase. Two hundred and forty patients were entered to the double-blind phase and randomly assigned to receive sertraline (n=119) or placebo (n=121). On the primary efficacy measure (relapse), there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (sertraline 10.1%; placebo 13.2%). However, the frequency of panic attacks was significantly (P=0.012) lower for sertraline compared to placebo. The proportion of sertraline-treated patients who met response criteria (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale score of 1 or 2) at the end of double-blind phase treatment was also significantly (P=0.003) higher for sertraline (89.9%) compared to placebo (74.4%). Panic Disorder Severity Scale total score was significantly (P=0.012) lower in the sertraline group compared to the placebo group. Adverse events during acute treatment were consistent with the known adverse event profile of sertraline, and the incidence of adverse events during the double-blind phase treatment was not different between sertraline and placebo.
这项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机撤药研究的目的是评估舍曲林治疗日本DSM-IV惊恐障碍患者8周的疗效和安全性。患者(n = 394)最初接受8周的开放标签舍曲林治疗,随后接受8周的双盲治疗,治疗药物为舍曲林(50 - 100毫克/天)或安慰剂。开放标签阶段的应答者有资格进入双盲阶段。240名患者进入双盲阶段,并随机分配接受舍曲林(n = 119)或安慰剂(n = 121)治疗。在主要疗效指标(复发)方面,两个治疗组之间没有显著差异(舍曲林组为10.1%;安慰剂组为13.2%)。然而,与安慰剂相比,舍曲林治疗的惊恐发作频率显著更低(P = 0.012)。在双盲阶段治疗结束时,达到应答标准(临床总体印象改善量表评分为1或2)的舍曲林治疗患者比例也显著更高(P = 0.003),舍曲林组为89.9%,而安慰剂组为74.4%。与安慰剂组相比,舍曲林组的惊恐障碍严重程度量表总分显著更低(P = 0.012)。急性治疗期间的不良事件与舍曲林已知的不良事件特征一致,双盲阶段治疗期间舍曲林组和安慰剂组的不良事件发生率没有差异。