Harris Susan R, Roxborough Lori
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 2B5, Canada.
Neural Plast. 2005;12(2-3):229-43; discussion 263-72. doi: 10.1155/NP.2005.229.
The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of studies that examined the efficacy and effectiveness of postural control intervention strategies for children with CP. Only physical therapy interventions were included, e.g. adaptive seating devices, ankle foot orthoses, neurodevelopmental treatment. A multifaceted search strategy was employed to identify all potential studies published between 1990 and 2004. The search strategy included electronic databases, reference list scanning, author and citation tracking of relevant studies, and hand searching of pediatric physical therapy journals and conference proceedings. Twelve studies (1991-2004), comprising ten group design studies and two single subject studies, met our inclusion criteria. A variety of age ranges and severity of children with cerebral palsy (n=132) participated in the studies. The study quality scores ranged from 2 to 7 (total possible range of 0 to 7) with a median score of 5.5 and a mode of 6. As was true in an earlier systematic review on adaptive seating, most of the 12 'experimental' studies published since 1990 that were aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of postural control strategies provided lower levels of evidence, i.e. Sackett Levels III to V. Additional studies with stronger designs are needed to establish that postural control interventions for children with CP are effective.
本文旨在对研究脑性瘫痪(CP)儿童姿势控制干预策略的疗效和有效性的研究进行系统综述。仅纳入物理治疗干预措施,例如适应性座椅装置、踝足矫形器、神经发育疗法。采用多方面检索策略来识别1990年至2004年间发表的所有潜在研究。检索策略包括电子数据库、参考文献列表扫描、相关研究的作者和引文追踪,以及对儿科物理治疗期刊和会议论文集的手工检索。十二项研究(1991 - 2004年),包括十项组设计研究和两项单病例研究,符合我们的纳入标准。各种年龄范围和严重程度的脑性瘫痪儿童(n = 132)参与了这些研究。研究质量得分范围为2至7(总可能范围为0至7),中位数为5.5,众数为6。正如早期关于适应性座椅的系统综述一样,自1990年以来发表的旨在评估姿势控制策略有效性的12项“实验性”研究中的大多数提供的证据水平较低,即萨克特证据水平III至V。需要更多设计更严谨的研究来证实针对CP儿童的姿势控制干预措施是有效的。