Nakagawa Makoto, Kuwabara Yasuo, Taniwaki Takayuki, Sasaki Masayuki, Koga Hirofumi, Kaneko Koichiro, Hayashi Kazutaka, Kira Jun-ichi, Honda Hiroshi
Department of Radiology, Fukuoka Red Cross Hospital, 3-1-1 Ookusu, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815-8555, Japan.
Ann Nucl Med. 2005 Jun;19(4):267-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02984618.
To clarify the relationship between D2 receptor binding and the cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRGlu) in patients with parkinsonism, we simultaneously measured both of these factors, and then compared the results.
The subjects consisted of 24 patients: 9 with Parkinson's disease (PD), 3 with Juvenile Parkinson's disease (JPD), 9 with multiple system atrophy (MSA), and 3 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The striatal D2 receptor binding was measured by the C-11 raclopride transient equilibrium method. CMRGlu was investigated by the F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose autoradiographic method.
The D2 receptor binding in both the caudate nucleus and putamen showed a positive correlation with the CMRGlu in the PD-JPD group, but the two parameters demonstrated no correlation in the MSA-PSP group. The left/right (L/R) ratio of D2 receptor binding in the putamen showed a positive correlation with that of CMRGlu in the MSA-PSP group, while the two demonsrated no correlation in the PD-JPD group.
Our PET study showed striatal D2 receptor binding and the CMRGlu to be closely related in patients with parkinsonism, even though the results obtained using the L/R ratios tended to differ substantially from those obtained using absolute values. The reason for this difference is not clear, but this finding may reflect the pathophysiology of these disease entities.
为阐明帕金森综合征患者D2受体结合与脑葡萄糖代谢率(CMRGlu)之间的关系,我们同时测量了这两个因素,然后比较结果。
研究对象包括24例患者:9例帕金森病(PD)患者、3例少年帕金森病(JPD)患者、9例多系统萎缩(MSA)患者和3例进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)患者。采用C-11雷氯必利瞬态平衡法测量纹状体D2受体结合情况。通过F-18氟脱氧葡萄糖放射自显影法研究CMRGlu。
在PD-JPD组中,尾状核和壳核的D2受体结合与CMRGlu呈正相关,但在MSA-PSP组中这两个参数无相关性。在MSA-PSP组中,壳核D2受体结合的左右(L/R)比值与CMRGlu的L/R比值呈正相关,而在PD-JPD组中二者无相关性。
我们的PET研究表明,帕金森综合征患者纹状体D2受体结合与CMRGlu密切相关,尽管使用L/R比值获得的结果与使用绝对值获得的结果有很大差异。这种差异的原因尚不清楚,但这一发现可能反映了这些疾病实体的病理生理学。