Plainis Sotiris, Ginis Harilaos S, Pallikaris Aristophanis
VEIC, Dept. of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece.
J Vis. 2005 May 23;5(5):466-77. doi: 10.1167/5.5.7.
It is well accepted that the accommodation system is characterized by steady-state errors in focus. The purpose of this study was to correlate these errors with changes in ocular wavefront aberration and corresponding image quality when accommodating. A wavefront analyzing system, the Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System (COAS), was used in conjunction with a Badal optometer to allow continuous recording of the aberration structure of the eye for a range of accommodative demands (up to 8 D). Fifty consecutive recordings from seven subjects were taken. Monocular accommodative response was calculated as (i) the equivalent refraction minimizing wavefront error and (ii) the defocus needed to optimize the modulation transfer function at high spatial frequencies. Previously reported changes in ocular aberrations with accommodation (e.g., the shift of spherical aberration to negative values) were confirmed. Increased accommodation errors for near targets (lags) were evident for all subjects, although their magnitude showed a significant intersubject variability. It is concluded that the one-to-one stimulus/response slope in accommodation function should not always be considered as ideal, because higher order aberrations, especially changes of spherical aberration, may influence the actual accommodative demand. Fluctuations may serve to preserve image quality when errors of accommodation are moderate, by temporarily searching for the best focus.
人们普遍认为,调节系统的特点是在聚焦时存在稳态误差。本研究的目的是将这些误差与调节时眼波前像差的变化以及相应的图像质量相关联。使用一种波前分析系统,即完整眼科分析系统(COAS),结合巴达尔验光仪,以便在一系列调节需求(高达8D)下连续记录眼睛的像差结构。对7名受试者进行了连续50次记录。单眼调节反应计算为:(i)使波前误差最小化的等效屈光度,以及(ii)在高空间频率下优化调制传递函数所需的散焦。先前报道的调节时眼像差的变化(例如,球差向负值的偏移)得到了证实。所有受试者近目标(滞后)的调节误差增加都很明显,尽管其大小在受试者之间存在显著差异。得出的结论是,调节功能中的一对一刺激/反应斜率不应总是被视为理想情况,因为高阶像差,尤其是球差的变化,可能会影响实际的调节需求。当调节误差适中时,波动可能通过暂时寻找最佳焦点来保持图像质量。