Theagarayan Baskar, Radhakrishnan Hema, Allen Peter M, Calver Richard I, Rae Sheila M, O'Leary Daniel J
Vision CRC, Rupert Myers Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Jan;29(1):65-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00610.x.
To investigate the effect of altering the spherical aberration (SA) of the eye on the static accommodative response.
Participants were fitted with nominally afocal contact lenses with controlled amounts of SA of either -0.2, -0.1, 0.0, +0.1 or +0.2 microm for a 5-mm pupil. Measurements of SA and root mean square (RMS) total aberration for the eye plus lens for each participant were determined with a Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System aberrometer. Accommodation was stimulated either by placing targets at different dioptric distances from the eye, or by using a fixed distance target and placing negative-powered lenses in front of the eye. Accommodation responses were determined with a Shin-Nippon autorefractor.
For both stimuli situations, the slope of the accommodation stimulus-response function was lowest for the lenses with +0.2 microm SA, and increased as the amount of SA was reduced. There was a significant negative correlation between SA and slope. Lag of accommodation at 33 cm correlated well with added SA, but did not correlate with total RMS error. There was no significant difference between the responses at 30 min after lens wear started and the responses after 1 h.
Adding negative SA to the eye generally improves the slope of the accommodation stimulus-response curve and decreases lag of accommodation, and positive added SA depresses the slope of the stimulus-response curve and increases lag. The effect seems to be specific to SA, as there was no relationship between lag and RMS error. Altering SA may be a viable way of changing accommodative functions in clinical situations.
研究改变眼睛的球差(SA)对静态调节反应的影响。
为参与者佩戴名义上无焦的隐形眼镜,其针对5毫米瞳孔的SA控制量分别为-0.2、-0.1、0.0、+0.1或+0.2微米。使用综合眼科分析系统像差仪测定每位参与者眼睛加镜片后的SA和均方根(RMS)总像差。通过将目标置于距眼睛不同屈光度距离处,或使用固定距离目标并在眼前放置负屈光度镜片来刺激调节。使用 Shin-Nippon 自动验光仪确定调节反应。
在两种刺激情况下,SA为+0.2微米的镜片的调节刺激-反应函数斜率最低,且随着SA量的减少而增加。SA与斜率之间存在显著的负相关。33厘米处的调节滞后与增加的SA相关性良好,但与总RMS误差无关。佩戴镜片开始后30分钟的反应与1小时后的反应之间无显著差异。
给眼睛增加负SA通常会改善调节刺激-反应曲线的斜率并减少调节滞后,而增加正SA会压低刺激-反应曲线的斜率并增加滞后。这种影响似乎特定于SA,因为滞后与RMS误差之间没有关系。改变SA可能是在临床情况下改变调节功能的一种可行方法。