Fenk R, Schneider P, Kropff M, Huenerlituerkoglu A N, Steidl U, Aul C, Hildebrandt B, Haas R, Heyll A, Kobbe G
Department of Haematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Br J Haematol. 2005 Aug;130(4):588-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05641.x.
We conducted a randomised trial comparing an intensified versus a standard conditioning regimen for high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. In this study, 56 patients were randomly assigned for high-dose therapy with melphalan 200 mg/m2 or with idarubicin 42 mg/m2, melphalan 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg. The primary objective was response rate. Acute toxicity, mainly because of infections, was higher in the intensified treatment arm with a treatment-related mortality of 20% versus 0% in the standard arm. This lead to the early discontinuation of the study. Response rates did not differ significantly between both treatment arms {intensified versus standard: complete response+near complete remission 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26-74%] vs. 33% (95% CI 17-55%), partial remission 35% (95% CI 16-61%) vs. 50% (95% CI 30-70%)}. After a follow-up of 5 years, the median time-to-progression and overall survival were not significantly different between both patient groups. Analysis restricted to patients surviving the first 100 d after transplant showed a better outcome for patients with >or=2 bad prognostic risk factors in the intensified treatment arm, however all treatment-related deaths occurred within this group of patients. In conclusion, intensified conditioning for high-dose therapy had intolerably high toxicity without improving outcome in patients with multiple myeloma.
我们开展了一项随机试验,比较强化预处理方案与标准预处理方案用于多发性骨髓瘤患者大剂量化疗后自体干细胞移植的效果。在本研究中,56例患者被随机分配接受大剂量治疗,分别是美法仑200mg/m²,或伊达比星42mg/m²、美法仑200mg/m²及环磷酰胺120mg/kg。主要目标是缓解率。强化治疗组的急性毒性(主要因感染所致)更高,治疗相关死亡率为20%,而标准治疗组为0%。这导致该研究提前终止。两个治疗组的缓解率无显著差异(强化组与标准组:完全缓解+接近完全缓解分别为50%[95%置信区间(CI)26 - 74%]对33%(95%CI 17 - 55%),部分缓解分别为35%(95%CI 16 - 61%)对50%(95%CI 30 - 70%))。随访5年后,两组患者的中位疾病进展时间和总生存期无显著差异。对移植后存活100天以上的患者进行分析显示,强化治疗组中具有≥2个不良预后风险因素的患者预后较好,然而所有治疗相关死亡均发生在该组患者中。总之,强化预处理用于大剂量治疗对多发性骨髓瘤患者毒性过高,难以耐受,且未改善预后。