Suppr超能文献

患者对临床试验的态度:一份问卷的编制及哮喘和癌症患者的结果

Patient attitudes to clinical trials: development of a questionnaire and results from asthma and cancer patients.

作者信息

Jenkinson Crispin, Burton John S, Cartwright Julia, Magee Helen, Hall Ian, Alcock Chris, Burge Sherwood

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):244-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00335.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a questionnaire to assess patients' views of clinical trials, and to report the results from the questionnaire in two patient groups: asthma and cancer.

DESIGN

A 43 item questionnaire asking patients about their views to clinical trials was developed on the basis of interviews with trialists and focus groups with patients. The questionnaire was mailed to patients with a diagnosis of either asthma or cancer. A set of items was then selected, via statistical analyses, to form the core of the questionnaire.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a diagnosis of cancer in one NHS Hospital Trust, and patients with a diagnosis of asthma in two NHS Hospital Trusts.

RESULTS

Completed questionnaires were received from 353 cancer patients and 578 asthma patients. Factor analyses of the data indicated that 22 items contributed to five dimensions: 'positive beliefs', 'safety', 'information needs', 'negative expectations' and 'patient involvement'. Differences between asthma and cancer patients on these dimensions were small. A regression of these dimension scores against a variable asking if patients would be willing to take part in trials found that 'safety' and 'information needs' did not contribute significantly to the model for either asthma or cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A questionnaire has been developed for use in assessing patients' views towards clinical trials. Results from the surveys reported here suggest that patient views about the importance of trials and beliefs about the value of patient involvement are likely to be predictive of whether or not patients will agree to take part in a study.

摘要

目的

编制一份问卷以评估患者对临床试验的看法,并报告该问卷在哮喘和癌症两组患者中的调查结果。

设计

在对试验人员进行访谈以及与患者进行焦点小组讨论的基础上,编制了一份包含43个条目的问卷,询问患者对临床试验的看法。该问卷被邮寄给诊断为哮喘或癌症的患者。然后通过统计分析选出一组条目,形成问卷的核心部分。

参与者

一家国民健康服务(NHS)医院信托机构中被诊断为癌症的患者,以及两家NHS医院信托机构中被诊断为哮喘的患者。

结果

共收到353名癌症患者和578名哮喘患者填写完整的问卷。对数据进行因子分析表明,22个条目构成了五个维度:“积极信念”、“安全性”、“信息需求”、“消极期望”和“患者参与度”。哮喘患者和癌症患者在这些维度上的差异较小。将这些维度得分与一个询问患者是否愿意参加试验的变量进行回归分析发现,“安全性”和“信息需求”对哮喘患者或癌症患者的模型均无显著贡献。

结论

已编制出一份用于评估患者对临床试验看法的问卷。此处报告的调查结果表明,患者对试验重要性的看法以及对患者参与价值的信念可能会预测患者是否会同意参加一项研究。

相似文献

1
3
Measuring cancer clinical trial understanding.
Health Commun. 2011 Jan;26(1):82-93. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.527624.
4
Preliminary development of a questionnaire measuring patient views of participation in clinical trials.
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Oct 21;12(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4724-z.
5
Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Clinical Trial Participation in Oman: A cross-sectional study.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018 Feb;18(1):e54-e60. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.01.009. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
South Asian patients' views and experiences of clinical trial participation.
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):636-42. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh611. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
8
Initial development of a questionnaire evaluating perceived benefits and barriers to pediatric clinical trials participation.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Mar;34(2):218-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

3
A multinational survey of potential participant perspectives on ocular gene therapy.
Gene Ther. 2024 May;31(5-6):314-323. doi: 10.1038/s41434-024-00450-4. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
4
Factors Affecting the Good Governance in Teaching Hospitals: A Narrative Review.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Aug 30;37:94. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.94. eCollection 2023.
6
Survey of perspectives of people with inherited retinal diseases on ocular gene therapy in Australia.
Gene Ther. 2023 Apr;30(3-4):336-346. doi: 10.1038/s41434-022-00364-z. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
10
The Impact of an Educational Video on Clinical Trial Enrollment and Knowledge in Ethnic Minorities: A Randomized Control Trial.
Front Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;7:104. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00104. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Aug 1;19(15):3554-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3554.
2
Attitudes to randomized clinical trials amongst out-patients attending a medical oncology clinic.
Health Expect. 1999 Mar;2(1):33-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00028.x.
3
4
5
Patient participation in research in the managed care environment: key perceptions of members in an HMO.
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jul;15(7):492-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.07025.x.
6
7
Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography.
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Aug;18(4):328-52. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00236-x.
8
Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in Whitehall II (prospective cohort) study.
BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):558-65. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.558.
10
Volunteers or victims: patients' views of randomised cancer clinical trials.
Br J Cancer. 1995 Jun;71(6):1270-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.245.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验