Suppr超能文献

输注性5-氟尿嘧啶给药方案及剂量强度评估:一项西南肿瘤协作组和东部肿瘤协作组的研究

Assessment of infusional 5-fluorouracil schedule and dose intensity: a Southwest Oncology Group and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

作者信息

Leichman Cynthia G, Benedetti Jacqueline K, Zalupski Mark M, Hochster Howard, Shields Anthony F, Lenz Heinz-Josef, Wade Iii James L, Bearden Iii James D, Macdonald John S

机构信息

Comprehensive Cancer Center, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA 92262, USA.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2005 Jul;5(2):119-23. doi: 10.3816/ccc.2005.n.024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Building on results from Southwest Oncology Group trial 8905, this trial was designed to compare low-dose continuous infusion (LDCI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus intermittent high-dose infusion (HDI) of 5-FU in disseminated colorectal cancer (CRC) for evidence of survival advantage based on dose intensity. A companion trial was funded to assess molecular parameters associated with fluoropyrimidine response or resistance and toxicity from these treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility included histologic diagnosis of disseminated CRC, measurable or evaluable disease, no previous therapy for metastatic disease, performance status of 0-2, and adequate renal, hepatic, cardiac, and hematologic function. Stratification factors were measurable versus evaluable disease, performance status of 0/1 versus 2, presence versus absence of adjuvant therapy, and presence versus absence of previous surgery and enrollment on the companion trial. Patients were randomized to receive (1) LDCI 5-FU 300 mg/m(2) per day for 28 days every 5 weeks or (2) HDI 5-FU 2,600 mg/m(2) for 24 hours each week.

RESULTS

Between April 1995 and May 1999, 730 patients were accrued (LDCI arm, n = 360; HDI arm, n = 370). Of these, 708 eligible patients were assessable for survival and 690 for toxicity. Median survival for both groups was 13 months. Toxicity was mild; < 10% of patients in both arms had grade > 4 events. There were 8 study-related deaths (1%). Less than 10% of patients were enrolled in the companion trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing 5-FU dose intensity yields no survival advantage beyond that achieved with LDCI 5-FU. This study confirms the favorable toxicity profile of infusional 5-FU. Because no preferential benefit was observed for either infusion schedule, the more convenient weekly schedule should be considered for 5-FU-based combination regimens for disseminated CRC.

摘要

背景

基于西南肿瘤协作组8905试验的结果,本试验旨在比较5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的低剂量持续输注(LDCI)与间歇性高剂量输注(HDI)在播散性结直肠癌(CRC)中的疗效,以确定基于剂量强度的生存优势证据。一项配套试验获得资助,以评估与氟嘧啶反应或耐药性以及这些治疗的毒性相关的分子参数。

患者和方法

入选标准包括播散性CRC的组织学诊断、可测量或可评估的疾病、既往未接受过转移性疾病治疗、体能状态为0-2以及肾、肝、心和血液学功能正常。分层因素包括可测量与可评估疾病、体能状态0/1与2、是否接受辅助治疗、是否接受过先前手术以及是否参加配套试验。患者被随机分为两组,分别接受:(1)每5周每天300mg/m²的5-FU低剂量持续输注,共28天;(2)每周24小时2600mg/m²的5-FU高剂量间歇性输注。

结果

1995年4月至1999年5月期间,共招募了730例患者(低剂量持续输注组,n = 360;高剂量间歇性输注组,n = 370)。其中,708例符合条件的患者可评估生存情况,690例可评估毒性。两组的中位生存期均为13个月。毒性较轻;两组中<10%的患者发生4级以上事件。有8例与研究相关的死亡(1%)。不到10%的患者参加了配套试验。

结论

增加5-FU剂量强度并不能带来超过5-FU低剂量持续输注的生存优势。本研究证实了输注5-FU具有良好的毒性特征。由于两种输注方案均未观察到明显的优势,对于播散性CRC的基于5-FU的联合方案,应考虑更方便的每周方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验