Predanic Mladen, Perni Sriram C, Chasen Stephen T, Baergen Rebecca N, Chervenak Frank A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Weill College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.092.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antenatal umbilical cord coiling index obtained during the fetal anatomic survey in the second trimester as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome.
Four hundred twenty-five consecutive women who had a fetal anatomic survey between 18 to 23 weeks of gestation were evaluated for umbilical cord coiling. The antenatal umbilical cord coiling index was calculated as a reciprocal value of the distance between a pair of coils (antenatal umbilical cord coiling index = 1/distance in cm) and was correlated with the following adverse pregnancy outcomes: (1) small for gestational age, (2) mode of delivery, (3) presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, (4) presence of nonreassuring fetal status in labor, and (5) Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes.
A total of 294 patients had adequate ultrasound images and all antenatal and labor data to meet the study inclusion criteria. Abnormal coiling was associated significantly with small for gestational age neonates at birth (P = .043) and non-reassuring fetal status in labor (P = .007). Nine of 58 neonates (15.5%) with abnormal umbilical coiling were small for gestational age infants compared with 15 of 236 small for gestational age neonates (6.4%) who had normal cord coiling. A non-reassuring fetal status in labor was observed in 25.7% of fetuses (15/58 fetuses) with abnormal umbilical coiling compared with 11.0% of fetuses (26/236 fetuses) with normal cord coiling. In contrast, no statistical difference for Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes or higher prevalence of interventional deliveries and meconium-stained amniotic fluid in labor between the groups with normal and abnormal umbilical cord coiling was observed.
Abnormal umbilical cord coiling that is detected at the fetal ultrasound anatomic survey in the second trimester is associated with a higher prevalence of small for gestational age neonates and non-reassuring fetal status in labor. This observation can be used potentially as a predictor of adverse antenatal or perinatal events in future studies.
本研究旨在评估孕中期胎儿解剖学检查时获得的产前脐带盘绕指数,作为不良妊娠结局的预测指标。
对425例在妊娠18至23周期间进行胎儿解剖学检查的连续孕妇进行脐带盘绕评估。产前脐带盘绕指数计算为一对盘绕之间距离的倒数(产前脐带盘绕指数=1/距离,单位为厘米),并与以下不良妊娠结局相关:(1)小于胎龄儿,(2)分娩方式,(3)羊水粪染,(4)产时胎儿窘迫,以及(5)1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分。
共有294例患者有足够的超声图像以及所有产前和分娩数据,符合研究纳入标准。异常盘绕与出生时小于胎龄儿(P = 0.043)和产时胎儿窘迫(P = 0.007)显著相关。58例脐带盘绕异常的新生儿中有9例(15.5%)为小于胎龄儿,而236例脐带盘绕正常的小于胎龄儿中有15例(6.4%)。25.7%的脐带盘绕异常胎儿(15/58例胎儿)出现产时胎儿窘迫,而脐带盘绕正常的胎儿中这一比例为11.0%(26/236例胎儿)。相比之下,脐带盘绕正常组与异常组之间在1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分、干预性分娩的较高发生率以及产时羊水粪染方面未观察到统计学差异。
孕中期胎儿超声解剖学检查中检测到的脐带盘绕异常与小于胎龄儿的较高发生率和产时胎儿窘迫相关。这一观察结果在未来研究中有可能作为产前或围产期不良事件的预测指标。