Shapira Y, Artru A A, Cotev S, Muggia-Sulam M, Freund H R
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195.
Anesthesiology. 1992 Jul;77(1):79-85. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199207000-00012.
Disagreement exists regarding the need to restrict the administration of fluid and glucose following head injury to prevent cerebral edema and neurologic deterioration. We examined whether blood osmolality and glucose, neurologic outcome, and the development of brain edema following head trauma were altered by intravenous infusion of large volumes of isotonic or hypertonic fluids that contained or did not contain glucose. Fifty-five rats that survived ether anesthesia and closed head trauma (delivered using a weight drop device) were assigned to one of five groups. In the first group no fluid was infused. In the second group minimal volumes of saline were infused during placement of a jugular vein catheter. In the three remaining groups 10 ml.kg-1.h-1 of either total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (glucose 25%, amino acids 4.25%, 40 mEq/l sodium and 40 mEq/l potassium, 1935 mOsm/kg), dextrose 5% in 0.45% saline (495 mOsm/kg), or Haemaccel (isotonic plasma expander, 298 mOsm/kg) was infused via the jugular vein. Following head trauma and cannula placement, ether was discontinued. Neurologic severity score at 1 and 18 h after head trauma was used to assess neurologic outcome. A score between 0 and 6 was assigned by an observer who was blinded as to the experimental groups, with 0 representing no neurologic damage and 6 representing severe damage. Specific gravity of brain tissue samples containing gray matter and subcortical white matter from the traumatized and contralateral hemispheres was measured at 18 h after head trauma to determine the development of brain edema. There were no statistically significant differences in neurologic outcome and brain edema between the groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对于头部受伤后是否需要限制液体和葡萄糖的输注以预防脑水肿和神经功能恶化,目前存在分歧。我们研究了静脉输注大量含或不含葡萄糖的等渗或高渗液体是否会改变头部创伤后的血渗透压和血糖、神经功能结局以及脑水肿的发生情况。55只在乙醚麻醉和闭合性头部创伤(使用重物下落装置造成)后存活的大鼠被分为五组。第一组不输液。第二组在放置颈静脉导管时输注少量生理盐水。其余三组通过颈静脉分别输注10 ml·kg-1·h-1的全胃肠外营养(TPN)(葡萄糖25%,氨基酸4.25%,钠40 mEq/l,钾40 mEq/l,1935 mOsm/kg)、5%葡萄糖溶于0.45%生理盐水(495 mOsm/kg)或贺斯(等渗血浆扩容剂,298 mOsm/kg)。头部创伤和插管后,停止使用乙醚。使用头部创伤后1小时和18小时的神经严重程度评分来评估神经功能结局。由一名对实验组不知情的观察者给出0至6分,0分表示无神经损伤,6分表示严重损伤。在头部创伤后18小时测量包含创伤侧和对侧半球灰质和皮质下白质的脑组织样本的比重,以确定脑水肿的发生情况。各组之间在神经功能结局和脑水肿方面没有统计学上的显著差异。(摘要截短至250字)